Is Pacquiao the greatest counterpunching brawler ever?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phantomas
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 1208
    • 32
    • 9
    • 8,245

    #31
    The idea is just ******ed. Pacīs technique will be sub-par forever, it is his artificially "enhanced" physical attributes what made Pac a fighter hard to beat.

    Comment

    • DeadLikeMe
      ................
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2011
      • 11968
      • 748
      • 1,409
      • 26,662

      #32
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      You can always identify an idiot when you ask them to name a legit historian and they name Bert Sugar.
      I like Bert but the man was already senile 15 years ago...if anyone doesn't believe me watch ESPN Classic any given morning.

      Comment

      • IronDanHamza
        BoxingScene Icon
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 49583
        • 5,045
        • 270
        • 104,043

        #33
        Originally posted by Rassclot
        I just named 2 of the absolute most respected boxing historians in the sport and d1ckhead here discredits both of them.

        how do you even talk sense with idiots like this?


        You really didn't.

        Comment

        • Rassclot
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2010
          • 1740
          • 125
          • 0
          • 2,141

          #34
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza
          You can always identify an idiot when you ask them to name a legit historian and they name Bert Sugar.
          you can always see a mouth breathing monkey when idiots write off bert sugar who has been around to see all the greats.

          the keeper of the boxing HOF.

          Comment

          • Rassclot
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2010
            • 1740
            • 125
            • 0
            • 2,141

            #35
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza


            You really didn't.
            Bert Sugar and Emmanuel Steward.


            yes I did. mmmmmmmkay, ******.

            Comment

            • BigStereotype
              #1 Knicks Fan
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 6177
              • 325
              • 792
              • 14,139

              #36
              Originally posted by Rassclot
              I just named 2 of the absolute most respected boxing historians in the sport and d1ckhead here discredits both of them.

              how do you even talk sense with idiots like this?
              I didn't discredit anyone, I just said that Bert Sugar is more of a storyteller than a historian and Emmanuel Steward is respectable but is basically a paid Pacquiao lobbyist while he's on tv.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49583
                • 5,045
                • 270
                • 104,043

                #37
                Originally posted by Rassclot
                you can always see a mouth breathing monkey when idiots write off bert sugar who has been around to see all the greats.

                the keeper of the boxing HOF.
                Originally posted by Rassclot
                Bert Sugar and Emmanuel Steward.


                yes I did. mmmmmmmkay, ******.




                I mean, Bert Sugar is the one most idiots go for as the main historian. And it makes sense because he's pretty much the only one known in the mainstream.

                But Emmanuel Steward?

                Comment

                • BigStereotype
                  #1 Knicks Fan
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 6177
                  • 325
                  • 792
                  • 14,139

                  #38
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza


                  You really didn't.
                  lol at this dude talking down to people who actually know boxing

                  He's tried to "prove" that astrology is highly relevant in prizefighting.

                  Comment

                  • Rassclot
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 1740
                    • 125
                    • 0
                    • 2,141

                    #39
                    Originally posted by BigStereotype
                    I didn't discredit anyone, I just said that Bert Sugar is more of a storyteller than a historian and Emmanuel Steward is respectable but is basically a paid Pacquiao lobbyist while he's on tv.
                    ****** doesn't even realize he's discrediting people then goes onto discredit them some more.


                    go pick up a book or something.

                    Comment

                    • The_Demon
                      Big dog
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 13604
                      • 1,354
                      • 888
                      • 22,971

                      #40
                      Originally posted by NChristo
                      Roberto Duran.
                      End thread/

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP