Originally posted by boxing2005
Everyone who recognized Vitali as THE champ better do the same for Rahman
Collapse
-
Originally posted by raesaadGreat post except Vitali was never TKOed or KOed by Maskaev and I believe they never even fought.Comment
-
Yeah, it was similar to the Byrd fight in that Vitali hurt his shoulder and didn't want to go on. Not a big deal because it was the amateurs and all, but I just wanted to point it out since people like to bring up Rahman's loss to Maskaev despite Rahman winning EVERY ****ING ROUND up until the insane 3 or 4 shots Maskaev landed to put Rahman on ***** street and through the ropes.Comment
-
Originally posted by NoMasHey bulldog/human being, Rahman was outboxing him and was on the verge of KOing him till he got hit with a monster shot.Comment
-
Originally posted by DiegoFuegoYeah, it was similar to the Byrd fight in that Vitali hurt his shoulder and didn't want to go on. Not a big deal because it was the amateurs and all, but I just wanted to point it out since people like to bring up Rahman's loss to Maskaev despite Rahman winning EVERY ****ING ROUND up until the insane 3 or 4 shots Maskaev landed to put Rahman on ***** street and through the ropes.Comment
-
do people(not meaning everyone) ever bother reading my posts? maybe it's because they are factual.
check into vk vs maskeav in amateur boxing and then parallel that with his kickboxing career and a post i made about this earlier.
point is, you can't argue against facts.Comment
-
Originally posted by Manny_Pand VITALI REALLY HELD ON TO IT HUh? Damn 1 year of Terror from Vitali. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT! Vitali held on to it by avoiding fights!
You dumbass, how many times did Rahman defend his belt?
Answer: Not even once lol
And that's the same thing that will happen when he tries to defend it this time. He only got it because DK was working behind the scenes to help him get it so that he can pay off his debts. I swear, you hanging off Rahman's nuts because you hate the Klits is really pathetic. What's more pathetic is the fact that it wouldn't have mattered who came along you would have hung from their nuts, like a ********** lolComment
-
Originally posted by DiegoFuegoHere's how I see it. Lennox Lewis was the linear champion, but he was never beat before he retired. So we get four champions, all of which should be considered paper champions until one starts unifying belts. The first guy to win 2 belts would be the champ in my book, but nobody wanted to unify. So no, Vitali was NOT the champ, and Rahman is NOT the champ.
However, Rahman brings a lot more prestige to the belt.
Rahman WKO5 Lewis (last HW champion)
Vitali LTKO6 Lewis (last HW champion)
Rahman rose to the occasion and won where Vitali couldn't. Rahman is a 2 time WBC champion, 1 time undisputed champion. Vitali is a 1 time WBC champion, never undisputed champion.
Rahman was KO'ed by Maskaev in 8
Vitali was TKO'ed by Maskaev in 1
Rahman KO'ed Sanders in 7
Vitali TKO'ed Sanders in 8
I mean, there is absolutely NO argument that Vitali is better than Rahman. None whatsoever! Every accolade Klitschko has, RAHMAN HAS ONE BETTER.
Rahman owns VitaliComment
Comment