If this fight happened in the next year or so on Friday Night Fights, who takes it?
Demetrius Andrade Vs Omar Henry on FNF
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
their managers take it...
right in the ass. from ESPN
that would be the dumbest move of all time. fighting eachother on fnf for ten grand when they are both prospects, lol.
prospects are an investment
some of them cause their promotors to take losses early in their careers. you protect your assets//investments unless the reward warrants the risk
why take a 50/50 fight at this stage in your career when you can get paid the very same amount against a no hoper and continue the climb toward huge paydays? -
their managers take it...
right in the ass. from ESPN
that would be the dumbest move of all time. fighting eachother on fnf for ten grand when they are both prospects, lol.
prospects are an investment
some of them cause their promotors to take losses early in their careers. you protect your assets//investments unless the reward warrants the risk
why take a 50/50 fight at this stage in your career when you can get paid the very same amount against a no hoper and continue the climb toward huge paydays?
I would think they wouldn't fight at this stage.
I'm just wondering NSB's opinion on who's the better fighter at this stage.
I know Henry's inactive, but until he shows me otherwise, I think he still has it.Comment
-
Mods, please delete this thread.
I forgot, if it's not Pac-May related, it's not NSB worthy. Thanks.Comment
-
Andrade is awful and only fights bums while the way Henry fights will have him gassed out if he ever has to go more than 8 rds but his power should be enough to get Andrade out of there.
Neither fighter is very good in my opinion or will make much noise ever.Comment
-
their managers take it...
right in the ass. from ESPN
that would be the dumbest move of all time. fighting eachother on fnf for ten grand when they are both prospects, lol.
prospects are an investment
some of them cause their promotors to take losses early in their careers. you protect your assets//investments unless the reward warrants the risk
why take a 50/50 fight at this stage in your career when you can get paid the very same amount against a no hoper and continue the climb toward huge paydays?
This is one of boxing's biggest problems, protected fighters. Guys are brought along soft and promoted as the next best thing and than when they're exposed the public feels deceived. A few losses shouldn't mean the end of the world or a fighters credibility but the general public has been brainwashed into thinking that by promoters who protect fighters far to long. Boxing needs to get back to the days when the best fought the best, whether it be the best prospects, contenders or elite fighters.Comment
Comment