Originally posted by GRUSTLER
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ariza Talks Further on Arum Issues, Manny Pacquiao, More
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by edgarg View PostThey weren't really questions, they were leading straight into diatribes against Arum. In the very first and ONLY real question Terciera (who is aknown antiArum writer) asked about the confusion of whether there is negotiation on a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight.
Right away, with no hint of any connection, Ariza began pouring out a rant against Arum and didn't even begin to answer anything of the actual question itself. And Terciera, once he had established which way he wanted the "interview" to go, didn't even persist in the question, which, after all...... was really what he wanted to know.....wasn't it???.
Then all the other "questions" were really barely veiled statements, to each one of which that bonehead Ariza enthusiastically answered with a "YES", and proceeded along the Arum bashing lines that Terciera wanted. Ariza even said in various ways, that he had NO PROOF that Arum was actually interfering, but he could be doing it through 3=4 intermediaries, without himself coming into the public eye. You know, like a Borgia, or some evil genius.
The original interview in FIGHT TRIPE did not contain a few heated comments by Ariza, it was a very long, extremely hostile, out-of-control, drunken-sounding, imbecilic rant in a constant stream of the foulest language. It was steered in that direction by the questioner, who, again, was giving the answers as "questions", to which all Ariza had to do was vent off on them. Extremely obvious, and in a court of law a lawyer would be constantly admonished by a judge. Of course this wasn't a legal event, but a sensation-mongering yellow outlet.
In HIS world, this may be a normal way of communicating with others, but in Arum's world, it can hardly be inagined. If Arum ever reads the whole FIGHT TRIPE interview, he's bound to respond somehow. If it were me, I would make sure to publicize the whole interview all over the news in full detail, and then ask Ariza, "how do you know all these things":. "What proof do you have" "When did these things happen"..."did anyone suggest these things to you'...
Actually for the last, according to the FIGHT TRIPE "interview" we KNOW that he got his so-called "information" from others who, oviously to everyone but an imbecile, were trying to make that long-attempted split between Arum and Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Leohappy View Postlol yeah pac makes a subpar performance against an opponent he should have destroyed , and they are already jumping off the ship, probably making such legit accounts as '*******s gtfo' and similar.reminds me of hayetards back in the summer lol! as soon as haye lost they vanished, that was a true e-genocide if i ever witnessed one on the forums.
Comment
-
Originally posted by marvin douglas View Postplyometrics, what the hell is that and how in the hell does it help you in boxing?
You won't be able to walk for almost a week the first time you do it and it burns like 1000 calories in an hr period plus your heart rate stays elevated for hours after you are done so you burn more calories than if you just jogged.
***Super high heart rate....be ready****
Comment
-
Originally posted by edgarg View PostThey weren't really questions, they were leading straight into diatribes against Arum. In the very first and ONLY real question Terciera (who is aknown antiArum writer) asked about the confusion of whether there is negotiation on a Pacquiao-Mayweather fight.
Right away, with no hint of any connection, Ariza began pouring out a rant against Arum and didn't even begin to answer anything of the actual question itself. And Terciera, once he had established which way he wanted the "interview" to go, didn't even persist in the question, which, after all...... was really what he wanted to know.....wasn't it???.
Then all the other "questions" were really barely veiled statements, to each one of which that bonehead Ariza enthusiastically answered with a "YES", and proceeded along the Arum bashing lines that Terciera wanted. Ariza even said in various ways, that he had NO PROOF that Arum was actually interfering, but he could be doing it through 3=4 intermediaries, without himself coming into the public eye. You know, like a Borgia, or some evil genius.
The original interview in FIGHT TRIPE did not contain a few heated comments by Ariza, it was a very long, extremely hostile, out-of-control, drunken-sounding, imbecilic rant in a constant stream of the foulest language. It was steered in that direction by the questioner, who, again, was giving the answers as "questions", to which all Ariza had to do was vent off on them. Extremely obvious, and in a court of law a lawyer would be constantly admonished by a judge. Of course this wasn't a legal event, but a sensation-mongering yellow outlet.
In HIS world, this may be a normal way of communicating with others, but in Arum's world, it can hardly be inagined. If Arum ever reads the whole FIGHT TRIPE interview, he's bound to respond somehow. If it were me, I would make sure to publicize the whole interview all over the news in full detail, and then ask Ariza, "how do you know all these things":. "What proof do you have" "When did these things happen"..."did anyone suggest these things to you'...
Actually for the last, according to the FIGHT TRIPE "interview" we KNOW that he got his so-called "information" from others who, oviously to everyone but an imbecile, were trying to make that long-attempted split between Arum and Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostI noticed a significant decrease in Pac **** as well. Really don't like calling them names but man they act or are dumb for not seeing what was going on sooner. If they truly love Manny Pacquiao then they should be trying to reach out and tell him to kick Bob Arum to the curb.
Comment
-
-
Comment