Floyd beats Pac coz JMM beat Pac who lost to Floyd?

[Tamis!]

I always see people say this that Floyd would school Pac, coz JMM gave Pac problems thru the years, yet JMM was schooled by Floyd. It's gonna be a mismatch, one-sided, blah blah blah...

One thing they tend to forget tho...

JMM isn't a southpaw like Pac.

And we know Floyd's style is inclined perfectly for an orthodox fighter.

So, will it still be the same? I mean, Floyd still is the sure winner over Pac, who's a southpaw? Just because we'll base it on the Floyd-JMM turnout?

Feel free to comment pls. Trollers can suck their own d1ck.

[Doctor_Tenma]

I don't think anyone is making that pick based on the triangle theory, at least I hope not.

He beats Pacquiao because Manny looks ordinary when confronted with movement, 2nd half against Cotto, the Mosley fight, and as we saw in the 3rd Marquez fight. He may have shown great improvement against your typical come forward stationary guy, but against the boxer-type...he's still the same fighter for the most part.

[V.WEBB]

I see what you're saying, but every since the fight was first talked about years ago, I had Floyd beating Manny, handily. What the Manny-Marquez fights have shown us, is that Manny struggles with counterpunchers (which we already knew). That just so happens to be Floyd's staple.

Care to further elaborate about how Floyd is with southpaws?

[Phenom]

I don't know why people keep saying Floyd would have problems with pressure southpaw when its proven its false but we know for a fact that Manny is a sucker for the straight right cant cutoff the ring and have problems with with boxers/counter punchers

[V.WEBB]

I don't think anyone is making that pick based on the triangle theory, at least I hope not.

He beats Pacquiao because Manny looks ordinary when confronted with movement, 2nd half against Cotto, the Mosley fight, and as we saw the 3rd Marquez fight. He may have shown great improvement against your typical come forward stationary guys, but against the boxer-type, he's still the same fighter.

Right. Another thing that needs to be factored in how effective Floyd is fighting in close quarters. I can see him doing alot of work there, if that is what he decides to do.

[SyrianUser]

Pacquiao himself said that Marquez caused him problems because he is a counter-puncher , and Marquez is a 38 year old Lightweight past his prime , Mayweather is the best counter-puncher in the world , he is younger than Marquez and he will not be disavantaged by the weight .



+ Pacquiao missed alot against a 38 year old Marquez moving up in weight and Mayweather is the best defensive boxer in the world .



And again , Marquez a 38 year old Lightweight , said that he didnt feel Pacquiao's punches :

https://<iframe width="560" height="...reen></iframe>

[Tamis!]

I see what you're saying, but every since the fight was first talked about years ago, I had Floyd beating Manny, handily. What the Manny-Marquez fights have shown us, is that Manny struggles with counterpunchers (which we already knew). That just so happens to be Floyd's staple.

Care to further elaborate about how Floyd is with southpaws?

Well my bad coach, not really struggle, but more of "unfamiliar" I should say, allow me to edit it later.

I mean, Floyd's defense is highly suited for an orthodox fighter coz he uses his shoulder to block the orthodox's right hand, that's basically it.

Corley, Judah, nah. Ortiz had a moment of brilliance, then laid flat afterwards.

[laudium]

Ortiz is still no Pacquaio, and he had his moments in their with floyd.

[Phenom]

Ortiz is still no Pacquaio, and he had his moments in their with floyd.

Ortiz does a lot of things better then Pacquiao

[RlCKY]

Same thread, different day...

Weren't all these BS threads supposed to be combined?