Originally posted by fishman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Chavez Sr: Marquez Broke The Pacquiao Myth
Collapse
-
-
Lol. An Anti-American MExican. What else is new. Your right about the Taylor fight, it was for pnd for pnd supremacy, and
Chavez got a straight up gift. Its ok when the officials favor a Mexican though, right? The Pac/Marquez fight was CLOSE, period. I wouldnt have been shocked if it went either way, but to call it a Robbery is utterly ridiculous. Please dont talk about ass beatings online, it makes you look like a total b*itch. And to say Chavez's record wasnt padded with losers is down right ignorant, which, as a Mexican you probably are. Listen to you, all sore over someone online dissing Mexican boxing. Sad at many levels.....Sad because you know im right, at least to some degree. As for the Angulo loss, your making my point for me. Mexicans only open their mouths to complain about Mexican boxing or speak on their boxers. Never to speak on anyone else or boxers in general. Thats why Mexicans are ****ty fans, they are so blinded by their one sided vision, and "love" for their fighters that they cant be objective. And your actually defending piss-drinking? LOL F*ucking awesome. No reason to drink your own piss for the left over vitamins when you can just injest fresh ones. He drank it because piss actually tastes better then most Mexican food and drinks. And I could give a **** who won the fight, Im not Pac ballhugger, just a boxing fan who thought the fight was close, way too close to be called a robbery. Its only an outrage when the Mexicans dont win.....riiite. Where were you for the Williams/Lara Robbbery? Sitting at home, licking your greasy, piss scented fingers, ...but definitely not on here *****in about an actual robbery in boxing. Typical ignorant piss breath.
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Postdude you are soo wrong on soo many different levels, you need to get your ass beatdown by a mexican so you can learn to control your mouth a little bit,your just all over the place,a loss is a loss and Angulos loss why should we complain? it speaks for itself what could anyone say about being ko'ed what???The only obvious sore loser here is you because pac isnt getting away with his "victory" this time! the world is calling him out on it and he doesnt like it one bit!JMM has every right in the world to be upset as do his fans because he didnt lose in fact he won damn handily, it was very shameless what AMERICANS in vegas did since they bet their house on pacman ,they surley would be dumpster diving and taken tremendous losses had theyonly been honest. .As an American it shames me that those judges love money more than any sort of integrity the fight was not close.And all this "you gotta beat the champ" crap is code for -"we dont want to give your guy the victory under any circumstances unless he scores a ko which is undebatable then""Yeah JMM drank his own piss,but whats that make you?? whats that make pac? hes more than all of you combined he beat this asian clown whos supposed to be "unbeatable" and proved almost every idiot on earth like you dead wrong!JMM and Mexicans EARNED the right to complain we are the largest boxing audience our boxers we also have historically the most world champs overall the most period, and in contention,and we aint having none of this pac being the greatest talk cuz our guy just whooped that ass and the entire world knows it only idiots like you are still debating a crystal clear ass beatdown lol....Jcc douchey wins??? the meldrick taylor win was for pnd for pnd supremacy his record is untouchable by anyone in boxing today,and hes in the guiness book for most championship contests in the history of the sport ,You obviousley hate mexicans sad for you,we make tacos and still can beat your ass or anyone's for that matter,Even at 38 yrs old with every disadvantage conceivable except ring intelligence something pac will NEVER have.Last edited by fishman; 11-22-2011, 01:39 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stl_Buay View PostI guess the judges and a couple of others were the only ones watching the fight. The first two fights were closer and that's why Marquez got at least one judge in both fights. He got outworked and he didn't want to try to to win so he didn't get knocked down but at the same time he didn't get close to winning. I'm going to say something and I know its not going to be popular but F-It! I was raised to be a strong black man and speak my mind. I think the boxing community is hating on Pacquiao because he's Asian and not African American or Mexican who are suppose to be the two dominate ethnic group and nationality in boxing. People say well he couldn't do to Marquez what he did to the others DUHH. The others came to fight. Marquez wanted to counter-punch and back peddle his way to victory and Pacquiao and the judges wasn't having it... He got outworked!!! He landed the prettier punches but Pacquiao landed the most punches, the harder punches, and threw the most punches. Look at Pacquiao's face after the 3rd fight compared to the first two he took far less hard shots and look at Marquez face after the third fight compared to the first two. He took harder shots in the third fight. Cry and Bitc$ all you want but the numbers and eyes don't lie. Mexicans saying the guy that back peddled and counter punched won over the aggressor that came forward and landed more punches and fought like a true Mexican warrior. That can only be motivated by something else. I don't know how many times Mexicans cried foul over a decision in a simular fight when the guy that fought like Marquez was black and the guy that fought like Pac was Mexican. If Marquez wanted to win he should had fought like he did in the first two fights, yeah he got knocked down but he was closer to winning. He couldn't get not one judge this time to award him for his back peddling, I don't want to risk anything display of boxing... If Pacquiao chose to fight like Marquez it would have been just as boring as Marquez vs. Mayweather so I would like to thank Pac for thinking about the fans that paid their money and not turning the fight into Marquez and Mayweather's counter punch let's put PPV buyers to sleep fest..
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Postdude you are soo wrong on soo many different levels, you need to get your ass beatdown by a mexican so you can learn to control your mouth a little bit,your just all over the place,a loss is a loss and Angulos loss why should we complain? it speaks for itself what could anyone say about being ko'ed what???The only obvious sore loser here is you because pac isnt getting away with his "victory" this time! the world is calling him out on it and he doesnt like it one bit!JMM has every right in the world to be upset as do his fans because he didnt lose in fact he won damn handily, it was very shameless what AMERICANS in vegas did since they bet their house on pacman ,they surley would be dumpster diving and taken tremendous losses had theyonly been honest. .As an American it shames me that those judges love money more than any sort of integrity the fight was not close.And all this "you gotta beat the champ" crap is code for -"we dont want to give your guy the victory under any circumstances unless he scores a ko which is undebatable then""Yeah JMM drank his own piss,but whats that make you?? whats that make pac? hes more than all of you combined he beat this asian clown whos supposed to be "unbeatable" and proved almost every idiot on earth like you dead wrong!JMM and Mexicans EARNED the right to complain we are the largest boxing audience our boxers we also have historically the most world champs overall the most period, and in contention,and we aint having none of this pac being the greatest talk cuz our guy just whooped that ass and the entire world knows it only idiots like you are still debating a crystal clear ass beatdown lol....Jcc douchey wins??? the meldrick taylor win was for pnd for pnd supremacy his record is untouchable by anyone in boxing today,and hes in the guiness book for most championship contests in the history of the sport ,You obviousley hate mexicans sad for you,we make tacos and still can beat your ass or anyone's for that matter,Even at 38 yrs old with every disadvantage conceivable except ring intelligence something pac will NEVER have.
10-10-2011, 10:26 AM #98
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostListen, while Pac may win this fight because of him being comfortable because of the weight. By no means will he school or destroy JMM. JMM has a nightmarish style for Manny Pacquiao and Pac ain't known for being a 1 punch KO artist, so don't know what people are talking about him KO'n JMM in 6 rounds when he could not do it at his best weight in 24rds with 4 kd's. I'm taking the loss to Floyd at 144 with a grain of salt because Floyd is a different kind of fighter/boxer. JMM could not properly touch Floyd because of his size, reach and defense while Pac doesn't have any of them advantages over Juan Manuel Marquez. On top of that. Pac hasn't been fighting the toughest most competitive challenges in the division(s) so lets give Juan Manuel Marquez some credit for being the only fighter to make Pac have to go all out.
It's not size but skill and while Pac may be stronger at that weight, I think skill is what gets you through a fight and frankly JMM is a better boxer technically than Pac when he fights his fight and not Pac's. I know most are crying foul with this fight but I'm going to give JMM the benefit of the doubt because of his skill set and ability to make Manny have to fight. I'm actually looking forward to this match because am curious to see how it transpires.
Originally posted by GRUSTLER View PostManny can be and probably is stronger than JMM at this weight but how can you base that he will annihilate JMM when all Manny has been fighting are guys slower than him with no defense or real boxing technicality? Also, basing Pac will flatten JMM over the fact that Floyd made JMM look useless at 144 is not good enough proof because JMM fought Floyd and no one looks good against Mayweather. May have moments but eventually gets shut down. I think if JMM hasn't been KO already then he won't be if he fights Manny smart instead of letting his nuts hang. Manny may indeed win but I'm not going to say he destroys JMM considering styles make fights and JMM has always had a style to bother Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fishman View PostLol. An Anti-American MExican. What else is new. Your right about the Taylor fight, it was for pnd for pnd supremacy, and
Chavez got a straight up gift. Its ok when the officials favor a Mexican though, right? The Pac/Marquez fight was CLOSE, period. I wouldnt have been shocked if it went either way, but to call it a Robbery is utterly ridiculous. Please dont talk about ass beatings online, it makes you look like a total b*itch. And to say Chavez's record wasnt padded with losers is down right ignorant, which, as a Mexican you probably are. Listen to you, all sore over someone online dissing Mexican boxing. Sad at many levels.....Sad because you know im right, at least to some degree. As for the Angulo loss, your making my point for me. Mexicans only open their mouths to complain about boxing or speak on their boxers. Never to speak on anyone else or boxers in general. Thats why Mexicans are ****ty fans, they are so blinded by their one sided vision, and "love" for their fighters that they cant be objective. And your actually defending piss-drinking? LOL F*ucking awesome. No reason to drink your own piss for the left over vitamins when you can just injest fresh ones. He drank it because piss actually tastes better then most Mexican food and drinks. And I could give a **** who won the fight, Im not Pac ballhugger, just a boxing fan who thought the fight was close, way too close to be called a robbery. Its only an outrage when the Mexicans dont win.....riiite. Where were you for the Williams/Lara Robbbery? Sitting at home, licking your greasy, piss scented fingers, ...but definitely not on here *****in about an actual robbery in boxing. Typical ignorant piss breath.Last edited by boxingfan76; 11-22-2011, 02:03 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SceneSpectator! View PostWhat had Chavez Sr said is true, he is a real Mexican anyway. And it's true that Oscar and Shane was a finished fact, because Pac did it! Margarito is slow? Yes, it's true when it comes to Pac, Shane and PWills, but not to Cotto, Cintron and Clottey of course! And also Hatton was retirable, but not a reason when he lose to Floyd Sr. in Floyd's home turf at WW, but retired when Pac assailed him and beat him in his undsputed home turf at JWW in spectacular passion! Not at all a disrespect Mr. Chavez Sr, you just failed to add the truth!
What in the world? ^^^^^
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Top Rank- View Postfvkk Chavez...dude aint ****.
Aint this the same guy who built an 80-0 sumthin record fighting chicken farmers, and cumbia singers only to get his @ss dusted by sweat pea, oscar and just about every legit opponent he faced?
Dude needs to quit doing interviews liquer'd up.
Comment
Comment