Margarito cracked wrap mystery solved by 24/7

[PEBBLES!]

I will bet you every point I have that Cotto wins this fight.

Margarito is a shot fighter, about to exposed as the cheating scum bag he is.

So, you're saying Cotto only wins because Tony's "shot"?


Some exposure.




I agree, if Pac took the last out of Margarito, Cotto could win. But Margarito is made of something else, so I'm not writing him off as quickly as I would most fighters after a beating like that toward the close of a long, hard career.

[ajohnz]

Dude, that was caught in the crack, it was probably there then fell off u can see clearly from the pic that was not thread. AND the blood? IN the same spot? The the fact trainer was banned for life...and the fact that Margs blames him and says he didn't know he had that? so how could he know if he had it for Cotto? Looking to defend your puto warrior, LMAO.

co-sign this. i think we can all agree margarito DID have something illegal in his glove before the mosley fight. margarito also obviously puts all the blame on his trainer and claims that he himself had no idea it was there. so then how is he even sure that he didn't have it during the cotto fight? impossible logic.

[turkas]

Regardless of what you think, this picture is clearly inconclusive. From one angle it looks like a thread, from another a tear or a rip. The quality just simply isn't good enough to make a judgment either way.

Regardless I will go to my grave believing he had loaded gloves in this fight and probably others. He is the most di****able person still involved in the sport, minus Panama Lewis and Capetillo.

[PEBBLES!]

That doesn't matter, he still landed blows but none of them thudded.

Tell Pac the bodyshot that laid him up didn't thud. Or tell Garcia (who was toyed with, period) the shot that dropped him didn't thud in his face.

I suppose the guy who got his face wrecked while sparring Tony was a victim of "plaster" use in sparring, too, huh?


Blood coming out of a fighter's ear is not unheard of. Maybe it was for Cotto up 'til that point, but he hadn't been fighting thirty-two Tony Margaritos. LMAO.


Lampley's a running joke on this forum. He calls fights, but he's not an expert, just a paid hyperbolist.




The funny thing is, I remember cats saying Tony had no chance and making statements like "have fun thinking of an excuse for Cotto's win" three and a half years ago, too. And I predicted, on here, that Tony would shock the boxing world . . . and he did.

Now you guys are just banking on the guy being "shot" and having a ****ed up eye.

Some redemption, huh?




This "crack" business has just been debunked and you guys can't even admit that.

[PRking718]

It took only a few seconds to see that it was NOT any sort of insertion into the bandage. Just think for a second. If anything like a "solid" pad were to be of any use, it would HAVE to be shaped exactly like the knuckles and fit exactly over the knuckles. This obviously was not so in the appearance of the bandages after the Cotto fight. They looked perfectly normal. I am surprised that Cotto would have lent himsefl to the dialogue in this video, and I saw a quote from him a few months ago saying that he did not accuse Margarito of having an illegal pad. But this video says differently.

The pad NEEDS to be soft to fit over the knuckles, the otherwise it can fit only on the back of the hand part meeting the knuckle, or across the fingers themselves which not only would be very obvious, but very uncomfortable and likely do damage to the knuckle itself.

Regardless of what 2 "Plaster of Paris" ingredients were found in the pre-Mosley fight used pad, one of them, according to this video was talcum. Talcum is widely used in boxing, as are other kinds of absorbent powders. The original announced 2 ingredients did not mention talcum as far as I recall, but the official report said that BOTH ingredients were used in many other manufactured items in PARTICULAR in cosmetics. Wellllll... talcum powder of course, is a cosmetic.

Anyway, I hope this is a great fight, and although Pacquiao may have taken too much out of Margarito. If he is any example of the great old time fighters, he shoudl be able to shrug it off and still be good. If so he should beat Cotto again, although, Cotto if he's smart, will stick to boxing instead of fighting. Is he capable of this for 12 rounds ...I don't know.

By the way the Chavez fight tonight was a lot better than expected and both fighters had their moments, but Chavez, as soon as he sensed the moment, and it was the RIGHT moment, was onto Manfredo like a tiger and beat him up in, as Col Bob said, 21 unanswered heavy punches. Result, ref stopped fight in 6th (I think).

Chavez is improving steadily, punching very fast and heavy, but still takes a little too much unneccessary punishment for my liking.

Yeah but Capetillo did not get banned for life for Talcum. The gauze had the plaster material on it. This hardens with time and moisture, i.e. sweat. Cotto did not say anything because proof had not yet come out. I doubt he had seen that photo. He wanted to handle it like a man until **** got crazy. His father came out about it before he did, saying he never saw gloves make a fight bleed out eyes and ears.

[turkas]

So, you're saying Cotto only wins because Tony's "shot"?


Some exposure.




I agree, if Pac took the last out of Margarito, Cotto could win. But Margarito is made of something else, so I'm not writing him off as quickly as I would most fighters after a beating like that toward the close of a long, hard career.

Sorry I will re word it for you. Cotto is gonna beat Margarito because he is a crap fighter, always has been (minus hand wraps of course).

You taking the bet? Or are you just gonna talk him up and then say "Pacquiao took the rest of what he had" once Cotto beats the living hell out of him and forces him to retire?

I imagine this is the same excuse his camp will use as well after Cotto destroys him.

[PRking718]

co-sign this. i think we can all agree margarito DID have something illegal in his glove before the mosley fight. margarito also obviously puts all the blame on his trainer and claims that he himself had no idea it was there. so then how is he even sure that he didn't have it during the cotto fight? impossible logic.

THANK YOU, a man of common sense and logical thought.

[Strike Back]

The fight is replaying right now... Like rd.5 or something, I think we should all watch it to re-live that epic fight. And see the booger maybe too.

[PEBBLES!]

turkas,

I don't even know how many points I have, I never look. If it means something to you, sure, we'll bet. Tell me how many I have and just bet the same amount if you have it. Or if you have a lesser amount, just say all yours to all mine, I don't mind.



Tony was a good enough fighter to beat your guy 100% legally as far as we know.

Don't get me wrong. I like Cotto as an individual and as a fighter. I sympathize with him to a degree - this whole thing must have been a mind**** and has led him down a path I can imagine it would be hard to extract himself from.

But Tony beat him, fair and square.

[turkas]

turkas,

I don't even know how many points I have, I never look. If it means something to you, sure, we'll bet. Tell me how many I have and just bet the same amount if you have it. Or if you have a lesser amount, just say all yours to all mine, I don't mind.



Tony was a good enough fighter to beat your guy 100% legally as far as we know.

Don't get me wrong. I like Cotto as an individual and as a fighter. I sympathize with him to a degree - this whole thing must have been a mind**** and has led him down a path I can imagine it would be hard to extract himself from.

But Tony beat him, fair and square.

My 16k to whatever you want to put up.

I wouldn't call Cotto "my guy", I just hate Maragarito lol.