Do you have Marquez above Barrera an Morales?

[El_Travieso_805]

I say no... Erik Morales is the best IMO... If it wasent for that treamendous performance that he had against Maidana then yes I would have had Marquez as the best... Barrera is last IMO... How about Marquez vs. Morales to settle who's the best Mexican p4p!? :-)

[Chups]

No. Morales is still number 1 followed by Barrera.

[delpilar]

Marquez is the best foot tripper compared to Barrera and Morales. Pacquiao couldn't get away from that foot-stepping.

[Left Hook Tua]

no.

maybe if you've only been following boxing post-2003.


barrera and morales made the hof before anyone even knew who the **** marquez and pacquiao was.

[Left Hook Tua]

No. Morales is still number 1 followed by Barrera.

you don't know ****!

barrera 1 , morales 2........

[wazaa.]

Resume wise, it's still Morales.

Skills wise JMM.

[wazaa.]

you don't know ****!

barrera 1 , morales 2........

But MAB is the bad guy and Morales is the good guy.

[lefthook2daliva]

Yes, Marquez is above both but all three have very respectable careers.

Wish Marquez fought Hamed. I was curious to see that one played out.

Me too, but I gotta' think that if Marquez can suck up Pac's shots, he has a pretty good chance of withstanding Naz' and he'd get hit less often by Naz than Pac.

I suppose the whole thing comes down to how likely it is that Naz would be able to put JMM all the way out with one or two shots.

[MJ223]

Yeah..... But I think an argument can be made for all 3......

[_original_]

Yes of course, and also would like to point out that every loss on Marquez' record is questionable besides when he moved up two weight classes to fight the great Mayweather.

People think he should fight Morales but I disagree, it does little for his legacy besides saying "I beat Erik Morales". I think he should go for Khan or Bradley, and really leave no doubt that he's best out of the Mexican Fab-3.