One would have to beat a champion convincingly....

[tomhawq]

exactly. pac haters and dumb *****s act as if marquez murdered pac. all he did was to defend his a55 without any intention of winning the fight.

can't even believe fantasy fights are valid in these site.

floyd would school pac and all that crap.

a boxer spends most of his time ducking and his fans say he'll beat so and so fighter if they fight.

what a load of crap.

[BigStereotype]

exactly. pac haters and dumb *****s act as if marquez murdered pac. all he did was to defend his a55 without any intention of winning the fight.

can't even believe fantasy fights are valid in these site.

floyd would school pac and all that crap.

You're too blinded by your fandom to watch boxing. GTFO my website.

[Young Money]

That is a myth.

You score a fight on effective aggression, ring generalship, defence and hard/clean punching.

Marquez won in all areas.

[tomhawq]

marquez didn't beat pac. that's the bottom line. how can you win a fight by mere counterpunching. it's impossible.

[Shogunofharlem1]

If you beat the champion 8 out of 12 rounds, you actually lose 5-7 on the scorecards.


That's just how it is, I thought this was a given?


To win 7-5, you must win at least 10 rounds. 8 rounds don't cut it.

It hasnt been like this for years. Your talking thirty years ago man.

[VaginaPuncher]

marquez didn't beat pac. that's the bottom line. how can you win a fight by mere counterpunching. it's impossible.

Because you can win a fight with counter punching. that's why.
pacs aggression was nullified every time jmm used his counter punching. thus landing cleaner harder punches whilst doing so.

[BigStereotype]

marquez didn't beat pac. that's the bottom line. how can you win a fight by mere counterpunching. it's impossible.

You don't know what you're talking about. I'm serious. You clearly have no knowledge of how boxing works. You can't win a fight by "mere counterpunching?" WTF does that even mean? Do you know what's more important than who was countering and who was leading? Who was landing. And counterpunching is still punching and Marquez was countering the hell out of him. GTFO MY WEBSITE

[Spray_resistant]

That is a myth.

You score a fight on effective aggression, ring generalship, defence and hard/clean punching.

Marquez won in all areas.

Yeah but who cares about the rules of boxing as long as Pac was coming forward and JMM was moving away.

[-Kev-]

I remember that. I still have that pic saved on my computer haha

Probably my best work so far.

[Ericd314]

Im so sick of this "the challenger has to be the more aggressor" BULLCRAP, that is a bunch of BULL, all the challenger has to do is win more rounds than the champion w/o knockdowns. And if you actually believe that Pacquiao won more rounds than JMM last night then you are delusional. I dont care what Compubox had, most of Pacquiaos punches could of came in the rounds he won, but over the course of the fight JMM won this fight, hands down. Im my own man, I have my OWN two eyes, I KNOW what I saw last night, I dont care what those three blind judges said, cant no one tell me what I did or didnt see with my OWN eyes, and I saw JMM confuse Manny, counter Manny, hurt Manny, and won at the least, I mean the very least 7 rounds, though I had JMM winning 8-4. These *******s I just dont understand how you thought Manny easily won this fight, he got his ass handed to him... ..