No, Marquez was not 'robbed' vs. Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 007geyweather
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2010
    • 741
    • 57
    • 14
    • 884

    #41
    Originally posted by Left2theliver
    I've rewatched the fight a few times since last night, and I have to say, that fight was a damn back and forth battle. There were some rounds in there that were just razor thin, right when you thought one of them was taking it, the other guy fired back. I scored it 115-113 for Pac last night, this morning I rewatched it and saw 115-113 for JMM. I'm just going to go ahead and say that this fight was a good, close, competitive fight. Could have gone either way. I actually feel kind of bad for the judges in this scenario. Unlike Lara/Williams, this fight was a back and forth war with both guys having their moments, seems like to be a judge in this situation means you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't do.

    But the impression I did get from this fight, from all the times I watched it is if you just watch the fight to watch it. You'll see that the majority of combinations landed more flush was from JMM, who I also felt controlled the pace for the majority of the fight.

    If they always fight like this, which after 3 nonstop action fights I think it's safe to assume they do, I'll be open to a 4th fight.

    BEST COMMENT I'VE READ SO FAR!

    I don't understand why everyone keeps saying. "CLEARLY HE WON THE FIGHT"

    It was a close fight and can go either way.

    But I do agree that Marquez was more relax in this fight and I can see it how Pacquiao's corner was in one of the situation where they don't know what to do.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP