Pacquiao/Marquez Post Fight Discussion- Please re-vote in the poll. .

[KFC(Fforfloyd)]

Can somebody help me here?


I have the 4th for Pacquiao as well.


here's what i saw. post the timelime if i miss something


JMM landed a left hook at pac left shoulder that sends him off balance @2:36
right to the body by JMM @1: 42

They traded body shots @ 1:35


Pac landed a solid left straight at JMM's forehead @2:25
left straight by pac @33
Pac's left again @29
left to the body by JMM @22
left stright landed by JMM @13
they traded @09


PACQUIAO ROUND AGAIN


did JMM Swept the remaining rounds???



Rounds 1 , 3 and 4 are very clear for Pacquiao and a good claim at round 2 as well.




if i miss something show me the time


40-36 Pacquiao after 4 rounds

i scored 1, 3, 4 and 6 for pacquiao as he was the more effective aggressor and landed more clean and hard punches

pac's best round by far was round 4 as this was the round he didnt threw jabs recklessly and actually connected when he did at a rate of 21% while JMM didnt land any clean jabs at all

if any of the rounds were a clinic, it had to be this, marquez had to fight pacquiao's fight and he dictated the pace as well as scored more

round 6 was good defensive clinic by both fighters, jmm pulled all the stops and seemed to have warmed up but once again pac completely shut down jmm's jab output, the power punches were close and pac landed 1 flush shot in the first half at around 1:40 of the fight which was the only flush shot in the 1st half and landed another more in the later half, all of jmm's power punches came in the 2 minutes of the fight and he raked in two flush power shots at the 1:27 mark or so after a pac jab missed
marquez closed out the round with a 4 combo flurry but only 1 punch landed, in the end pac out landed him with clean power punches 6-4

jmm dominated most of the 5th round as this was pac least active round, he went all jab in the first half and couldnt connect enough power punches to outland jmm
this was the same for round 2 but it was not a domination as jmm simply edged pac in punching output and being the effective aggressor as well as fighter

[Aidonia]

Told it exactly how it was..

[007geyweather]

1. I'm not Mexican.
2. Have you ever seen a boxing fight other than one Manny is in? This stuff happens all the time, just like headbutts between southpaws and orthodox boxers.
3. Your avatar makes you look like an idiot, Compubox stats should not and do not determine who should win a fight. If they did Marquez would have two wins against Manny already.
4. You're a biased idiot.

1. You are a mexicum wannabe
2. This is too far to be an accident and if when you move forward you dont move forward with hills landing first and toe high up on the air.
2. Compubox is not SOLELY used to judge the game but if you are landing more punches consistently it tells you something. If you think Marquez landed more watch it in slowmo.
4. You're a biased idiot.
5. You are a fcuking ******
6. Suck you moms **** again so you'd stop crying like a liltle babie
7. I grew up watching boxing
8. Mexican LOSE!!!!!
9. You expected too much from pacquiao and when it was a close fight you think it's automatic lose for him.
10. Drink Marquez pee pee

[Capo Loko]

Loved it. Lol @ " He shouldn't thank god for this" lulz.

Man, a lot of people think Marquez was robbed. I love it

[S H A R K B O Y]

One thing I love about these guys is that they tell it like it is and do not kiss ass for the cash cow when a brit is not involved. Respect to the brits and steve bunce for telling it like it is.

"Manny Disease: it obscures your vision so when you watch Manny fight, and you only see Manny hit other people"

[S H A R K B O Y]

Media in the US wants to rationalize this robbery so badly to keep the luster of Mayweather-Pacquiao...... its pathetic....

What are you smoking? The fight itself is enough to prove JMM will never win a decision even when he puts an ass whooping on him.

[turkas]

1. You are a mexicum wannabe
2. This is too far to be an accident and if when you move forward you dont move forward with hills landing first and toe high up on the air.
2. Compubox is not SOLELY used to judge the game but if you are landing more punches consistently it tells you something. If you think Marquez landed more watch it in slowmo.
4. You're a biased idiot.
5. You are a fcuking ******
6. Suck you moms **** again so you'd stop crying like a liltle babie
7. I grew up watching boxing
8. Mexican LOSE!!!!!
9. You expected too much from pacquiao and when it was a close fight you think it's automatic lose for him.
10. Drink Marquez pee pee

Jesus you're an idiot and you know squat about boxing.

I'm a Mexican wannabe because I think Pacquiao lost? Get your head straight.

And if you are going to make a compubox argument for this fight then you must admit Pacquiao lost the first two fights because Marquez won all of the punch stats in that fight. You can't have it both ways.

And you want me to suck my mom's tit? Well go suck Manny's **** because I am tired of you trying to do it on here. You and all of the other *******s are RUINING BOXING!

[-Kev-]

Yeah they violated Pacquiao. They really went in on him, so did some ESPN reporter.

ESPN reporter: "What about the Mayweather fight? Everybody thinks you got this decision FOR the Mayweather fight".

Hilarious. Pacquiao finally getting owned like the fraud that he is. The dumb media finally caught on after 3 years of being blinded by great matchmaking.

[savorduhflavor]

Great commentary. Just unabashed honesty, that's honestly how I felt.

One thing I do feel bad about is people are acting as if it's Manny's fault that Marquez got robbed and people are so down on Manny......Manny came to fight. There was no lack of effort he just gets befuddled by Marquez. It was a close fight and thanks to Manny for being one half of a great fight but....Marquez just clearly won.

[x3_bazooka_x3]