Pacquiao/Marquez Post Fight Discussion- Please re-vote in the poll. .

[RL_GMA]

3 hours? a fight is 36 minutes....3 minute rounds.....

I did it in less than an hour man, its not literally in extra slow motion but you can see what punches land. Pac DID NOT land 176 punches. I employ you to do the same and you will see what I seen.

Sarcasm went over your head...

Anycase, I don't need to watch a fight in slow motion to see what actually happened. Marquez's eye didn't get swollen by Pac not landing hard shots of his own. He landed a lot of punches, but again, Marquez's were the cleaner, more effective punches.

[bojangles1987]

He landed more in this fight vs a more defensive/counterpunching Marquez and he throws less in this fight then the other fights?

Yeah ok...

I never said that. I don't pay attention to Compubox, and am not here. I don't know if he landed as much as the other two fights, probably not. But he landed enough to win IMO. People seem to be ignoring the punches Pacquiao was landing.

[FeFist]

Seriously though?

99% of the fighters say that before 99% of the fights, is that really such a huge deal? If I got a penny for every athlete saying he/she was in the shape of their life when they really weren't, I'd be a millionaire by now.

Hell, RJJ put that video up a couple of weeks ago, saying that he's NOT washed up, and that he's about to pull off the best comeback in boxing history.

Will there be 3242342 posts about how he "lied" after he gets beat by some C-level fighter?

Throughout the fight Khan was saying what a great training camp Manny had.

[x3_bazooka_x3]

I never said that. I don't pay attention to Compubox, and am not here. I don't know if he landed as much as the other two fights, probably not. But he landed enough to win IMO. People seem to be ignoring the punches Pacquiao was landing.

Or people who were "Ignoring" Mannys punches saw that Manny wasnt landing those punches

[Carpe Diem]

[Cash Cow]

STFU, you Cretinous, little PPV-Cheer leading Groupie.

It's fucking sad beyond words that you have to bring up every little snippet, rumour, line from some random useless ****'s blog, A sentence from some mediocre hack garbage "Journalist", so as to get an imaginary 'One Over', over your Man-crush's main rival.

Guess what, they have medication to help you get over what you have.

Fuckin' Dough ball.

As far as Mayweather is concerned there is no point in the Filipino champion fighting Marquez again.

"Why? I mean, I truly feel that Marquez is never going to get the benefit of the doubt," Mayweather told Fighthype.com. "I want to congratulate Marquez and I want to congratulate Manny Pacquiao for doing it a third time, but I just feel like if you get it done right the first time, there's no need for a second or third fight, and if it is needed, do it again in the same fashion and in the same way, or do it even better. People fail to realize, when I faced Marquez, I was two years off just traveling and vacationing. I took two years off, no working out, no other activities. I went into training camp and then the fight had got pushed back because I had an injury, so that pushed it back a little bit more, but I still went out there and performed and looked marvelous. If I fight a guy and I don't knock him out, they say, "Well, Mayweather didn't knock him out." If I knock him out in the late rounds, they say, "Well, what took so long?" If I knock him out in the early rounds, they say, "Well, you can always catch a guy cold." Like I said before, I'm always in a no-win situation. If I fight a guy that's my age, they're going to say, "You know what? He's over the hill." When I fought Marquez, they said Marquez was over the hill. Remember, when I fought Marquez, I think he was 36 and I was 32. Now, two years later, Pacquiao is 32 and Marquez is 38."

[Cash Cow]

I never said that. I don't pay attention to Compubox, and am not here. I don't know if he landed as much as the other two fights, probably not. But he landed enough to win IMO. People seem to be ignoring the punches Pacquiao was landing.

they cant Ignore punches that arent actually landing.....

he didnt land many significant punches in any of the 12 rounds.

[MindBat]

Translation: I'm going to advise Manny to choose anyone but Floyd Mayweather.

Thanks. I was wondering what Arum was trying to imply.

[Cash Cow]

Sarcasm went over your head...

Anycase, I don't need to watch a fight in slow motion to see what actually happened. Marquez's eye didn't get swollen by Pac not landing hard shots of his own. He landed a lot of punches, but again, Marquez's were the cleaner, more effective punches.

Oh I did,

I think the way I typed the response made it appear as if i didnt...my bad

[i_am_a_champ]

Has anyone done this yet? I watched the fight in Slow Motion...


Pacquiao did NOT land 176 punches.

2004: In his first fight vs Juan Manuel Marquez, Manny Pacquiao threw 639 punches & landed 148 punches.

2008: In their 2nd fight Manny Pacquiao threw 619 punches & landed 157 punches.

He wasnt nearly as effective in the 3rd fight as he was in the previous 2 fights yet he threw less (578) and landed more (176) when Marquez was supposedly not being aggressive?....

I think the punch stats are wrong too. ive watched it in slow motion too.


I scored it 116-113 for JMM with round 1 being scored as a draw


1 - Draw
2 - jmm
3 - pac , very close round!
4 - pac, good round for pac
5 - jmm, snapping mannys head back several times
6 - jmm , just pipped it
7 - jmm, just pipped it towards end
8 - pac, landed harder shots
9 - jmm
10 - pac, late rally
11 - jmm
12 - jmm


final score 116-113 juan manual marquez


How on earth did they score this 116-112 for pac?!!!?!!!!!