Freddie Roach "Who The F*** Are Mayweather & Bradley? We'll Fight Martinez @ 150"

[Mr. Philadel]

You have a point on Floyd/Pac but I wonder if you were just as upset when Roy and BHop were being little divas during their prime to fight for a rematch. Especially towards BHop.

actually I didn't wanna see that rematch EVER....imo B.Hop could've NEVER beaten Roy in his prime....and when they FINALLY fought Roy stood no chance at all so I NEVER gave Hops props for Roy and NEVER will....and look man, B.Hop is my ****in dude....all day every day no matter what....my fav of them ALL....but I still keeps it real...never doubt that!!

[Brother Jay]

To be honest, you sound like one of those crackheads outside of a liquor store.

You know the kind that tries to have a long drawn out conversation that's full of a whole lot of nothing.

But I'm bored so let's talk. If Manny isnt a top fighter, then who is?

It's kind of hard to take anyone serious who claims Bernard Hopkins was the product of media hype/match making....smh

LOL .. I'm sure you would know as your life is apparently so miserable that you make plenty of trips to the liquor store. Just as I'm sure you get nice and loaded up before you show up here to argue about ... well, nothing!

Like I said ... either you'd man up and discuss the merits of BOXING on a BOXING website, or you'd guzzle down some more hooch and pontificate to others to forget your own personal problems.

That crackhead has been rubbing off on you more than you realize, chump. Oops I mean .. champ.

[Khalid X]

actually I didn't wanna see that rematch EVER....imo B.Hop could've NEVER beaten Roy in his prime....and when they FINALLY fought Roy stood no chance at all so I NEVER gave Hops props for Roy and NEVER will....and look man, B.Hop is my ****in dude....all day every day no matter what....my fav of them ALL....but I still keeps it real...never doubt that!!

I actually thought B-Hop could have beaten Roy if the fought back then.

Roy was great no doubt, but I never saw the separation (in talent/skills) from guys like Hopkins and Mayweather (back then) like most tried to claim.

I guess to each his own.....

[El.Naranjito707]

I miss when Roach didnt talk as much.

[Mr. Philadel]

I actually thought B-Hop could have beaten Roy if the fought back then.

Roy was great no doubt, but I never saw the separation (in talent/skills) from guys like Hopkins and Mayweather (back then) like most tried to claim.

I guess to each his own.....

I feel you TR....but Roy's speed imo would've kept him at least 2 or 3 steps ahead of B.Hop....if Ex has a weakness its dealing with speed imo

[007geyweather]

People will criticise Pac no matter what. The guy was a freakin lightweight three years ago now he's potentially gonna fight Sergio Martinez at 150 lbs. Don't talk about that catchweight champ shi t, Martinez is the one who's been calling HIM OUT. There's really no one at welterweight. Welterweight was a danger zone a couple of years ago. Manny has pummelled the crap out of Cotto, Margarito and Mosley. Mayweather doesn't want to fight him. Who else is there? Tim Bradley would be another Ricky Hatton-esque mauling. Devon Alexander has no heart and can't sell a ticket. Berto looked terrible against Ortiz and really doesn't deserve the fight. If he fights Ortiz, people are gonna say he's fighting Floyd's left overs. Martinez at 150 lbs isn't the most legitimate fight because Martinez is likely gonna be weight drained, but hey, you can't expect Manny to go up to middleweight to fight him. Manny struggles to even hit the 147 lbs limit. He's a smallish welterweight, and Martinez is, I guess the way I look at it, a huge jr-middleweight/smallish middleweight.

great speech there.. GREEN K!

[ThePrince]

[hugh grant]

Well then perhaps you would like to take a stab at it, Top Rank?

"I've said it before and I'll say it again:

Not one ******* on this site can reply here and come up with legitimate reasons for Manny Pacquiao to be rated #1, 2 or even 3. You don't get ranked in the top 3 spots for defeating men who are not ranked among the top 3. It just doesn't make sense.

So in what legitimate way has Pacquiao become a top ranked fighter in boxing?Pacquiao's last legitimate win over a top boxer came over Marquez in 2008!

Where is the rhyme and reason for calling Pacquiao a top boxer?

Defeating men who have star power names doesn't mean they had spots among the top ranked at the point Pacquiao beat them!

Explain this with some logic, *******s!"


Your reply will determine who the dumbasss is, and it isn't looking very good for you, Top Rank.

The ball is in your court. If you cannot answer the above challenge, sit down, shut up and accept your place among the *******ed peasants, you idiot.

ha ha, who did floyd beat to be p4p no1 way back when? He seemed to stay no1 for ducking and diving and retiring. Pac beat barrera, morales and JMM so should have been no1 on paper even if officially he wasnt deemed to be. What top p4p fighters did floyd beat to become no1 by your logic? WHile your at it, what great fighters has Sergio beat as well?
Pac demolished hatton better than Floyd and DLH so is deserving of no1 and everyone knows it.

Floyd seemed to be no1 on the basis he was american. Ducking cotto and margraito also kept him at no1 for some reason.

[pasawayako]

He's no role model for kids.

Yea he isn't but he's 10000x better person than floyd.

[SyrianKid]