Has Wlad lost a round since the first Peter fight

[cupocity303]

Wlad has a great resume

- All Time Great and Hall Of Famer

- 2nd most dominant fighter of all time (Big Brother Vitali is the most dominant fighter of all time)

- IBF/WBO/WBA/IBO/RING Unified Heavyweight Champion of the world

- Olympic Gold Medalist

- Ring Magazine Top 5 P4P Fighter

- 56 wins, 49 knockouts

- has made 17 dominant title defences

- has defeated 10 world champions:

David Haye (25-1)
Chris Byrd I (31-1)
Chris Byrd II (39-2)
Sam Peter I (24-0)
Sam Peter II (34-3)
Ruslan Chagaev (25-0)
Sultan Ibragimov (22-0)
Lamon Brewster (33-3)
Hasim Rahman (45-5)
Francois Botha (44-3)
Ray Mercer (30-4)

- has defeated tons of top contenders:

Eddie Chambers (35-1)
Tony Thompson (31-1)
Jameel McCline (28-2)
Calvin Brock (29-0)
Monte Barrett (23-0)
Axel Schulz (26-3)
Ray Austin (24-3)
DaVarryl Williamson (20-2)
Derrick Jefferson (23-2)
Charles Shufford (17-1)
Eliseo Castillo (18-0)
etc.....

- has defeated 8 undefeated fighters:

Sam Peter (24-0)
Ruslan Chagaev (25-0)
Sultan Ibragimov (22-0)
Calvin Brock (29-0)
Monte Barrett (23-0)
Eliseo Castillo (18-0)
Zoran Vujecic (14-0)
Najee Shaheed (16-0)

That's actually pretty good. With all the mindless opinions going around, it's good to just present the facts with statistics.

[Mikhnienko]

Well, admittedly, you are talking out of your arse. No one proclaimed Peter as the next Tyson. The only guy of recent years that has been hailed as the next Tyson was Jeff Lacy. Peter was never thought of as anything more than a possible champ and someone to get rid of the top fighters at the time.

90% of experts knew he was nothing more than a wild, fat ****er. He got beat by a fat, 40 year old James Toney for ****s sake! The next Mike Tyson.....

21.09.05 - By Justin Lloyd: The heir apparent, the heavyweight savior, the next Tyson. All of these phrases have been used to define the rising "star" which is Samuel Peter. He is marketable and respectful (at least outside of the ring), and one of the biggest punchers in the division. I agree with most writers that he is an exciting anomaly and a breath of fresh air.

Thats from an aricle in ********boxing couple of days before his fight with Wladimir. There have been other articles claiming Peter is the next big superstar in the HW division

lulz

[Stronger]

21.09.05 - By Justin Lloyd: The heir apparent, the heavyweight savior, the next Tyson. All of these phrases have been used to define the rising "star" which is Samuel Peter. He is marketable and respectful (at least outside of the ring), and one of the biggest punchers in the division. I agree with most writers that he is an exciting anomaly and a breath of fresh air.

Thats from an aricle in ********boxing couple of days before his fight with Wladimir. There have been other articles claiming Peter is the next big superstar in the HW division

...and HBO did a Peter hype video before the fight. Teddy Atlas said Peter is a monster, heir apparent, savior, etc.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

He lost a couple of rounds to Haye

[JAB5239]

Whats up with all the hate?

No hate bro, Im just interested in seeing a couple of links where people were proclaiming Peter as the next Tyson.

[JAB5239]

You sound like you are a fat loser who failed in a career as a professional prize fighter.

But you are not a fat loser who failed as a professional prizefighter right?

Right?

Now now my friend, lets not be snippy. You made a claim, Im just asking you to back it up. My apologies if you felt insulted.

[JAB5239]

Wlad has a great resume

- All Time Great and Hall Of Famer

- 2nd most dominant fighter of all time (Big Brother Vitali is the most dominant fighter of all time)

- IBF/WBO/WBA/IBO/RING Unified Heavyweight Champion of the world

- Olympic Gold Medalist

- Ring Magazine Top 5 P4P Fighter

- 56 wins, 49 knockouts

- has made 17 dominant title defences

- has defeated 10 world champions:

David Haye (25-1)
Chris Byrd I (31-1)
Chris Byrd II (39-2)
Sam Peter I (24-0)
Sam Peter II (34-3)
Ruslan Chagaev (25-0)
Sultan Ibragimov (22-0)
Lamon Brewster (33-3)
Hasim Rahman (45-5)
Francois Botha (44-3)
Ray Mercer (30-4)

- has defeated tons of top contenders:

Eddie Chambers (35-1)
Tony Thompson (31-1)
Jameel McCline (28-2)
Calvin Brock (29-0)
Monte Barrett (23-0)
Axel Schulz (26-3)
Ray Austin (24-3)
DaVarryl Williamson (20-2)
Derrick Jefferson (23-2)
Charles Shufford (17-1)
Eliseo Castillo (18-0)
etc.....

- has defeated 8 undefeated fighters:

Sam Peter (24-0)
Ruslan Chagaev (25-0)
Sultan Ibragimov (22-0)
Calvin Brock (29-0)
Monte Barrett (23-0)
Eliseo Castillo (18-0)
Zoran Vujecic (14-0)
Najee Shaheed (16-0)

Wlad has a crap resume and Vitaly's is even worse.

[jimmy1569]

The brother's as a whole have won about 92 % of all the rds they've ever fought.. we're talking less than 40 rds lost an equivalence of 3.33 12 rd bouts. Brother's have fought 104 times & total 504 rds... (a Klitschko bout lasts 4.85 rds on the average) This means that the Klitschko's win an equivalence of 11 rds every 12 they fight.... When the haters actually fathom how dominant that is.. it just will boggle there minds.. Not EVEN Floyd Mayweather & Manny Paquiao.. considered both the best pound for pound fighters in the world today come close to this figure..In fact i don't think any boxer besides them has won 90% of ALL the rds they've ever fought. Vitali wins about 95% & Wlad wins about 90%.... 'nuff said... I think this is a better gauge than just picking & choosing portions of there careers... as what they've done in the past 7 or 8 yrs is NOT far off from there ENTIRE careers.

[slickfox]

here is the best proof you can find that peter was the favorite....when someone says ill bet _____ but no odds they are taking the favorite

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47264

[Jedi Vader]

The brother's as a whole have won about 92 % of all the rds they've ever fought.. we're talking less than 40 rds lost an equivalence of 3.33 12 rd bouts. Brother's have fought 104 times & total 504 rds... (a Klitschko bout lasts 4.85 rds on the average) This means that the Klitschko's win an equivalence of 11 rds every 12 they fight.... When the haters actually fathom how dominant that is.. it just will boggle there minds.. Not EVEN Floyd Mayweather & Manny Paquiao.. considered both the best pound for pound fighters in the world today come close to this figure..In fact i don't think any boxer besides them has won 90% of ALL the rds they've ever fought. Vitali wins about 95% & Wlad wins about 90%.... 'nuff said... I think this is a better gauge than just picking & choosing portions of there careers... as what they've done in the past 7 or 8 yrs is NOT far off from there ENTIRE careers.

Now a nice list of all the illustrious ATG's would be nice to support those facts.