WBC says TD, but what about the CSAC?

[Light_Speed]

So is it possible for the CSAC to side with the ref, and the WBC giving Bhop the title back.

or is the WBC forcing the CSAC to rule with them?

Yes it's possible, boxing organisations don't depend on commissions, they can declare anybody champion regardless of the official result. Remember Zab kept his IBF belt after losing to Baldomir.

[Russian Crushin]

So is it possible for the CSAC to side with the ref, and the WBC giving Bhop the title back.

or is the WBC forcing the CSAC to rule with them?

It's possible because the WBC know that they can do ANYTHING they want but they are suppose to go b the official decision...I believe Hopkins deserves the titles back but that's up to the official CSAC to decide.

Can you imagine if they would all just decide who they thought won?...Hopkins maybe get his belt back but now it's a paper title and doesn't hold the LHw lineage

[-Hyperion-]

So is it possible for the CSAC to side with the ref, and the WBC giving Bhop the title back.

or is the WBC forcing the CSAC to rule with them?

WBC only has authority over the belt, they can't change the official result, and CSAC can rule whatever they want...

Remember the MAB-Morales fight....in the first, the WBO refused to give Morales the belt and kept Barrera as champion because of the controversy(and Barrera was one of the first fighters to legitimize WBO as a major title).In return, WBC refused to give MAB the title after their second fight(another controversial decision) and allowed Morales to fight for the vacant title in his very next fight.

[Russian Crushin]

Yes it's possible, boxing organisations don't depend on commissions, they can declare anybody champion regardless of the official result. Remember Zab kept his IBF belt after losing to Baldomir.

Nah that's different I think...I don't think the title was up for grabs in that fight

[NEETzsche]

forget the wbc and the csac, what does boxrec say?

[-Hyperion-]

Yes it's possible, boxing organisations don't depend on commissions, they can declare anybody champion regardless of the official result. Remember Zab kept his IBF belt after losing to Baldomir.

thats a bit different, Baldomir did'nt pay the sanctioning fee, thus, had no "right" to win the IBF title...

[PACnPBFsuck]

Yes it's possible, boxing organisations don't depend on commissions, they can declare anybody champion regardless of the official result. Remember Zab kept his IBF belt after losing to Baldomir.

Don't remember at all, but thanks for letting me know that

It's possible because the WBC know that they can do ANYTHING they want but they are suppose to go b the official decision...I believe Hopkins deserves the titles back but that's up to the official CSAC to decide.

Can you imagine if they would all just decide who they thought won?...Hopkins maybe get his belt back but now it's a paper title and doesn't hold the LHw lineage

I hope this isn't something the start of an epidemic, I know it's their belt, but i'm with you on this, they should let the CSAC do their job.

[PACnPBFsuck]

WBC only has authority over the belt, they can't change the official result, and CSAC can rule whatever they want...

Remember the MAB-Morales fight....in the first, the WBO refused to give Morales the belt and kept Barrera as champion because of the controversy(and Barrera was one of the first fighters to legitimize WBO as a major title).In return, WBC refused to give MAB the title after their second fight(another controversial decision) and allowed Morales to fight for the vacant title in his very next fight.

So Bhop still has a loss, until the CSAC final verdict.