WBC says TD, but what about the CSAC?

[PACnPBFsuck]

I gotta ask because I don't get it, how can the WBC rule the fight anything, if the CSAC still haven't given their verdict? or have they?

How can they do that?

[Larry the boss]

WBC sanctioned the bout..the ref was approved by the WBC..it was a WBC event....its the WBC title...so i'd think they are the most important in this case

[PACnPBFsuck]

WBC sanctioned the bout..the ref was approved by the WBC..it was a WBC event....its the WBC title...so i'd think they are the most important in this case

Good stuff Larry, but why at the end of Suliaman conversation it says,

"We hope that the California Commission will review our ruling at the next meeting in December"

Now my thing is, if they're still waiting for approval from the CSAC, how can Bhop get any decision yet.

[Russian Crushin]

WBC sanctioned the bout..the ref was approved by the WBC..it was a WBC event....its the WBC title...so i'd think they are the most important in this case

Honestly wtf are you talking about?

CSAC sanctions the fight, They are the most important, not the WBC. Without their sanction, there can be no fight. What It means for the WBC to "sanction" the fIght is that to have to pay them to have the belt involved

All this proves is how corrupt they actually are, deciding winners by themselves

[Larry the boss]

Good stuff Larry, but why at the end of Suliaman conversation it says,

"We hope that the California Commission will review our ruling at the next meeting in December"

Now my thing is, if they're still waiting for approval from the CSAC, how can Bhop get any decision yet.

They just hope they agree..but regardless Hopklins is their champ.and no 1 can overule that...plus the facts are clear as day man..how can a fight end with a tko when no punch has landed???

[Larry the boss]

Honestly wtf are you talking about?

CSAC sanctions the fight, They are the most important, not the WBC. Without their sanction, there can be no fight. What It means for the WBC to "sanction" the fIght is that to have to pay them to have the belt involved

All this proves is how corrupt they actually are, deciding winners by themselves

wbc sanctioned the fight..hence the sanctioning fee..no matter what Hopkins is their champion

[PACnPBFsuck]

They just hope they agree..but regardless Hopklins is their champ.and no 1 can overule that...plus the facts are clear as day man..how can a fight end with a tko when no punch has landed???

What if the CSAC agrees with ref, then what?

[Russian Crushin]

wbc sanctioned the fight..hence the sanctioning fee..no matter what Hopkins is their champion

Exactly what I said, sanctioning for the WBC means both guys have to pay to be able to fight for their title, NOTHING else.

And they have NO right whatsoever to simply go against the official decision, none whatsoever.

[-Hyperion-]

Exactly what I said, sanctioning for the WBC means both guys have to pay to be able to fight for their title, NOTHING else.

And they have NO right whatsoever to simply go against the official decision, none whatsoever.

They've done it before....Barrera-Morales 2...means **** though...Hopkins will have that L til CSAC say otherwise...Ring Magazine should respect the CSAC ruling, but the fact that they haven't given Chad his title is the first hard sign of GBP influence IMO...they say they're waiting for CSAC, but since as of today, the title is Chad's, i don't know why people aren't more concerned about Ring's decision to wait for the CSAC ruling

[PACnPBFsuck]

Exactly what I said, sanctioning for the WBC means both guys have to pay to be able to fight for their title, NOTHING else.

And they have NO right whatsoever to simply go against the official decision, none whatsoever.

So is it possible for the CSAC to side with the ref, and the WBC giving Bhop the title back.

or is the WBC forcing the CSAC to rule with them?