If Floyd fights Martinez, how can any "boxing fan" hate on that fight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #81
    Only people that i've seen hating on this fight arn't boxing fans at all.they are 1 cult followers of 1 fighter

    Comment

    • cupocity303
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 9604
      • 752
      • 750
      • 22,038

      #82
      Originally posted by Dedication
      So do you give Hopkins credit for beating Pavlik, Trinidad, etc?
      Of course I do. Your answer was in the post you replied to.

      Trinidad already had a 160 fight, and 160 World Title belt with a KO stoppage.

      With Pavlik, I give him that much more credit for conceding to a catchweight, instead of letting a 6'2 Pavlik move up and fight him at the Weight limit of 175, like Hopkins did Vs Tarver.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #83
        Originally posted by Cgarcia
        True. They get irritated when you put Sergio and Floyd in the same sentence. They want Pac and Sergio.

        read thru this thread and post 1 floyd fan hating on this fight..i can post several *******ed ass posters hating easily..

        Comment

        • WESS
          Most Definitely
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 13012
          • 977
          • 1,143
          • 20,219

          #84
          The Pac brigade is threatened by a Mayweather vs Martinez fight. Their ******ity towards a fight of this magnitude is understandable.

          Ironically they will be shouting Ortiz is a GOAT (not a tree) IF Pac "selects" him next. It will be another Ricky hatton/Shane Mosley experience all over again.

          Some how some way Pac is able to fight "better" versions of a fighter than Mayweather had done years earlier even when they where undefeated or World Champions. Another example is JMM at WW in 2011 at nearly 40.

          Some people are just gullible. Everyone give the Pacbirdies a hand, they try so hard, bless their little hearts.

          Comment

          • maguirre
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 7037
            • 543
            • 196
            • 11,164

            #85
            Originally posted by WESS
            Are you dumb?
            Yeah, I still remember this guy. You can't even mention Sergio as alternative fight for his idol. (I could dig up lots of posts of his regarding this.) He'd be annoyed and get back at you and ask you why not Pac for Sergio. Point is, if these apologists had their way you'll never see a Sergio/Floyd match up. Too much ****riding is not good man.

            ;-)

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30070
              • 2,143
              • 812
              • 105,596

              #86
              Originally posted by WESS
              Ironically they will be shouting Ortiz is a GOAT (not a tree) IF Pac "selects" him next. It will be another Ricky hatton/Shane Mosley experience all over again.

              Some how some way Pac is able to fight "better" versions of a fighter than Mayweather had done years earlier even when they where undefeated or World Champions. hearts.
              Well Pac did beat a better version of Hatton than Floyd. So what that Hatton was undefeated when he fought Floyd? Hatton knew he had to get himself better, and he did, getting himself a new trainer and all that. Before the Pac fight, he said he was better himself even.

              Only delusional Floyd lovers would say a boxer cant get better once hes lost his unbeaten record. Floydies are making rules up as they go along, trying to invent a game they cant lose!

              And yes, Pac would have beat the Hatton floyd fought as well better than Floyd. Pac beat the improved hatton in 2 rounds. Therefore the Hatton that fought Floyd probably wouldnt have lasted much more than one round against Pac, by my maths.
              Last edited by hugh grant; 10-20-2011, 07:09 PM.

              Comment

              • johnm is...
                ****in *** Broads
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2005
                • 10700
                • 820
                • 1,382
                • 48,813

                #87
                Originally posted by WESS
                The Pac brigade is threatened by a Mayweather vs Martinez fight.
                This is absolutely what it boils down to.

                And they're going to find any way they can to discredit it.

                Comment

                • WESS
                  Most Definitely
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 13012
                  • 977
                  • 1,143
                  • 20,219

                  #88
                  Originally posted by hugh grant
                  Well Pac did beat a better version of Hatton than Floyd. So what that Hatton was undefeated when he fought Floyd? Hatton knew he had to get himself better, and he did, getting himself a new trainer and all that. Before the Pac fight, he said he was better himself even.

                  Only delusional Floyd lovers would say a boxer cant get better once hes lost his unbeaten record. Floydies are making rules up as they go along, trying to invent a game they cant lose!

                  And yes, Pac would have beat the Hatton floyd fought as well better than Floyd. Pac beat the improved hatton in 2 rounds. The Hatton that fought Floyd probably wouldnt have lasted one round by my maths.
                  O that's right Hatton fired his entire career long team to hire Floyd Sr, The greatest boxing coach ever after he cried for weeks.

                  Hatton vs Floyd >>>>> Hatton vs Pac

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30070
                    • 2,143
                    • 812
                    • 105,596

                    #89
                    Originally posted by WESS
                    Hatton vs Floyd >>>>> Hatton vs Pac
                    Well a Floydie would say this wouldnt they. Hatton was undefeated when he fought Floyd, but he was close to being beaten many times, which im sure hadnt gone unnoticed by Floyd, and was very much aware of it. I thought it was Pac who chose opponents when he saw weaknesses?

                    I bet Floyd loved what he saw when he saw Hatton vs Collazo for instance.

                    Comment

                    • jcpryor
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 1327
                      • 69
                      • 0
                      • 7,832

                      #90
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      Well Pac did beat a better version of Hatton than Floyd. So what that Hatton was undefeated when he fought Floyd? Hatton knew he had to get himself better, and he did, getting himself a new trainer and all that. Before the Pac fight, he said he was better himself even.

                      Only delusional Floyd lovers would say a boxer cant get better once hes lost his unbeaten record. Floydies are making rules up as they go along, trying to invent a game they cant lose!

                      And yes, Pac would have beat the Hatton floyd fought as well better than Floyd. Pac beat the improved hatton in 2 rounds. Therefore the Hatton that fought Floyd probably wouldnt have lasted much more than one round against Pac, by my maths.

                      Lmao are you kidding me? You're saying that the Ricky Hatton that fought Pacquiao was better than the one that faced Mayweather? Freddie Roach is on video saying the exact opposite of that. He specifically said that Mayweather took a lot out of Hatton after they fought. If you can't at least concede that small point then you're just proving how delusional of a fan you really are.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP