THE RING Light-Heavy championship wont change hands.....yet

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • *Khan
    Banned
    • Feb 2011
    • 2479
    • 135
    • 244
    • 3,193

    #1

    THE RING Light-Heavy championship wont change hands.....yet

    THE RING Magazine light heavyweight belt will not change hands, pending the California State Athletic Commission’s ruling on a protest filed on behalf of Bernard Hopkins.

    Chad Dawson was awarded a second-round TKO victory over Hopkins after THE RING and WBC titleholder was sent to the canvas by a shoulder shove and dislocated a joint in his left shoulder Saturday night in Los Angeles.

    The shove was not ruled a foul by referee Pat Russell, who declared Dawson the winner because Hopkins couldn't continue.

    Golden Boy CEO Richard Schaefer, who represents Hopkins, said he plans to file an appeal with the commission. He believes the shove was an obvious foul and that the fight should’ve been declared a no-contest.

    George Dodd, executive officer of the commission, said the appeal will be heard at its next meeting, on Dec. 13 in Los Angeles.

    One reason THE RING decided to wait is that many observers seem to agree with Schaefer.

    For example, more than two thirds (68.1 percent) of voters in a ******.com poll believe the shove should’ve been ruled a foul. And a number of leading boxing writers at ringside Saturday – including ESPN’s Dan Rafael – believe Russell made the wrong call.

    Rafael Tweeted on Monday: “The more I watch the replay of the end of @THEREALBHOP fight the more I am convinced the result should and will be overturned.”

    Plus, while Dodd believes Russell did nothing wrong, he did acknowledge that Russell was positioned off Dawson’s left shoulder. Dawson used his right shoulder to shove Hopkins, which means Russell might not have had the best perspective.

    “Pat ruled it incidental contact; he didn’t rule it a foul,” Dodd said. “That was based on where he was at in relation to what happened. He couldn’t call what he didn’t see. He was on the other side of whatever happened.

    “… Now the commission will take the necessary steps to maintain the integrity of the fight.”

    The commission has overturned the result of fights in the past.

    One example is the James Toney-Hasim Rahman rematch in 2008. Toney was awarded a third-round TKO victory when Rahman couldn’t continue because of a cut over his left eye, the result of an accidental clash of heads. The commission later declared the bout a no-contest.

    Another example is Timothy Bradley-Nate Campbell in 2009. Bradley was awarded a third-round TKO when Campbell was cut, which the referee said resulted from a punch. The commission later reversed the decision and declared a no-contest, ruling a clash of heads caused the cut.
    http://ring tv.craveonline.com/blog/169724-ring-light-heavweight-belt-wont-change-hands-pending-appeal

    (remove the space on the link)
  • Capaedia
    JMM Stan
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2011
    • 2847
    • 185
    • 396
    • 9,501

    #2
    Shove?

    If by shove, they mean shoving Hopkins upwards by grabbing his legs, sure, it was a shove.

    Good call by the Ring though.

    Comment

    • ИATAS
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 36648
      • 2,509
      • 1,953
      • 50,835

      #3
      good for them. I don't see how this wont be overturned.

      Comment

      • da beatdown
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 727
        • 17
        • 11
        • 7,010

        #4
        I wonder if they overturn it and a rematch is ordered,if BHop will go thru with it? Cause he was definately wasnt prepared for the ruckus Dawson was bringing...

        Comment

        • ИATAS
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 36648
          • 2,509
          • 1,953
          • 50,835

          #5
          Originally posted by da beatdown
          I wonder if they overturn it and a rematch is ordered,if BHop will go thru with it? Cause he was definately wasnt prepared for the ruckus Dawson was bringing...
          how can anyone make that assumption after 1.5 rounds and a total of 5 punches landed by Dawson? The fight didn't even start yet, they were still feeling eachother out. Hopkins is also a slow starter, he was down against Pascal after four rounds in both fights.

          Now of course, I don't know the outcome if that didn't happen, no one does. Maybe dawson would have went on to whoop his ass. Maybe hopkins figures out his timing/speed and puts on a show. No one knows after 1.5 rounds of feeling out rounds, that's for sure.

          Comment

          • edgarg
            Honest BoxingScene posts
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2004
            • 11045
            • 547
            • 54
            • 39,228

            #6
            Originally posted by *Khan
            http://ring tv.craveonline.com/blog/169724-ring-light-heavweight-belt-wont-change-hands-pending-appeal

            (remove the space on the link)
            Another reason "The RING decided to wait" is because it's owned by Golden Balls/Oscar.

            Comment

            • edgarg
              Honest BoxingScene posts
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2004
              • 11045
              • 547
              • 54
              • 39,228

              #7
              Another reasin is that the Belt is owned by RING, which is owned by Golden Balls/Oscar.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #8
                Originally posted by ИATAS206
                good for them. I don't see how this wont be overturned.
                Yeah, no conflict of interest there

                Comment

                • Eaner0919
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 8625
                  • 370
                  • 80
                  • 15,578

                  #9
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Yeah, no conflict of interest there
                  IYO what's better

                  Dawson winning the belt in this manner

                  or Hopkins retaining his belt by rolling around on the ground

                  Comment

                  • figzuki
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 2187
                    • 73
                    • 83
                    • 8,413

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Eaner0919
                    IYO what's better

                    Dawson winning the belt in this manner

                    or Hopkins retaining his belt by rolling around on the ground
                    WOW, outstanding point of view, yea its better this way....

                    I thought he was winning the fight anyway since Hopkins was backtracking the whole time. So glad Kellerman asked him if this was a result of those dirty tactics lol, thats what he gets for lunging his body and trying to supress you so you can't counter. I think I hate Hopkins...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP