Better? Beating an undisputed or winning each belt separately?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • texasboi15
    Undisputed Champion
    • May 2011
    • 6461
    • 243
    • 68
    • 64,121

    #1

    Better? Beating an undisputed or winning each belt separately?

    Which would you say is a better way to become the undisputed?

    Defeating an undisputed or winning each belt separately?
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #2
    separately
    that's 4 wins as opposed to just 1

    Comment

    • Alx.
      Back from Prehab
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2011
      • 4786
      • 180
      • 328
      • 13,242

      #3
      separately, beating every holder in the division to unify is better

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 28305
        • 5,353
        • 4,523
        • 73,018

        #4
        Originally posted by Jack Napier
        separately
        that's 4 wins as opposed to just 1

        ^^^This^^^

        Beating 4 title holders ensures you're fighting the top fighters in the division and earning your right to be called the best instead of just getting a shot ala David Haye without really proving yourself.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP