Tweet
Why is it you appear to dismiss the idea of Khan v Kell Brook so quickly?
I agree that Kell Brook hasn't yet fought at world level, but Khan hasn't even fought at 147 yet!
Kell Brook has however fought at European level & lets take the N'Dou fight as an example. Brook DESTROYED N'dou & came closer than anybody ever has to stopping him. I don't care who you are or at what level for you to beat N'Dou the way he did is damn impressive.
Kell Brook is a big kid with very good power, speed, combinations, footwork, head & lateral movement. He is strong as an ox & he is becoming a star over in the U.K
He's a very talented boy as you will see tonight against another teak-tough Euro fighter.
I don't get why you seem to prefer Khan fighting Matthew Hatton who is no risk at all, what so ever.
He has nothing & brings even less than Brook does to the table. You clearly don't fancy the risk with Brook, same with rent-a-gob Khan & his team.
I think Brooks style is all wrong for Khan & Brook would knock the kid out.
He's bigger than Khan, fought much longer at 147, he's stronger, naturally bigger, he hits harder, he has better footwork & movement overall. His combinations are much better as his Prince Naseem esque defence! He would ****ing RUIN A mere con.
I am telling you now, he blasts Khan out within 5.
What sort of joker begs for a fight with Matthew Hatton & bigs him up to be a ''great fighter''? Seriously...
I agree that Kell Brook hasn't yet fought at world level, but Khan hasn't even fought at 147 yet!
Kell Brook has however fought at European level & lets take the N'Dou fight as an example. Brook DESTROYED N'dou & came closer than anybody ever has to stopping him. I don't care who you are or at what level for you to beat N'Dou the way he did is damn impressive.
Kell Brook is a big kid with very good power, speed, combinations, footwork, head & lateral movement. He is strong as an ox & he is becoming a star over in the U.K
He's a very talented boy as you will see tonight against another teak-tough Euro fighter.
I don't get why you seem to prefer Khan fighting Matthew Hatton who is no risk at all, what so ever.
He has nothing & brings even less than Brook does to the table. You clearly don't fancy the risk with Brook, same with rent-a-gob Khan & his team.
I think Brooks style is all wrong for Khan & Brook would knock the kid out.
He's bigger than Khan, fought much longer at 147, he's stronger, naturally bigger, he hits harder, he has better footwork & movement overall. His combinations are much better as his Prince Naseem esque defence! He would ****ing RUIN A mere con.
I am telling you now, he blasts Khan out within 5.
What sort of joker begs for a fight with Matthew Hatton & bigs him up to be a ''great fighter''? Seriously...
Comment