lol @ sergio haters

[calamaro]

HBO had 9-1 for Martinez (Lederman) I disagree, maybe 8-2 or 7-3. But, Barker is a bum for every one who said yesterday Proksa was unknow, I guess.

Itīs all about people liking boxing like a sport or Pac-Floy nuthuggers.

[sunny31]

Ledermans scorecard was a disgrace, barker won at least 3 rounds. Sky had martinez up 2 I believe going into the 11th.

[IronDanHamza]

Just because one is a nobody doesn't mean that they can't fight...Maybe Barker was was/is an underrated fighter...

To say he can't beat Floyd in a million years...Shows who the bias one actually is.

He's not, though.

A top P4P fighter has no business losing multiple Rounds to Darren Barker.

[Flabulous]

Fact: Serigo won the fight without a scratch on his face
Fact: sergio won by knock out
Fact: sergio was playing with baker for the first 5 or 6 rounds

Would he beat floyd? Probably not. But still, he's a p4p fighter. Just because he didn't win in 2 rounds does not mean he's a bum.

Also skysports is so damn bias towards brit fighters. Even HBO had martinez up like 7-2 or some ****

[IMG]http://i294.***********.com/albums/mm91/Django117/2r70zuv.png[/IMG]

[SLIMY RAT]

He's not, though.

A top P4P fighter has no business losing multiple Rounds to Darren Barker.

What do you mean he is not??

He clearly is/was on here.. most people didn't have him making round 6.. let alone winning on the scorecards at that stage.

The guy was showing a lot of promise before he got badly injured

[IronDanHamza]

What do you mean he is not??

He clearly is/was on here.. most people didn't have him making round 6.. let alone winning on the scorecards at that stage.

The guy was showing a lot of promise before he got badly injured

I would say it's more to do with Sergio Martinez being a little overrated than Barker being underrated.