Wladamir Klitscko vs Lennox Lewis.. who wins?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Run
    Outlaw
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 56190
    • 2,588
    • 4,569
    • 76,412

    #61
    Originally posted by oldgringo
    With Toney and Wlad, we are examining two largely unproven guys who are still questionmarks and who will never be considered a top 20 HW all-time.

    With Lewis and Wlad, we are looking at an ALL-TIME GREAT heavyweight and Wlad, who I discussed above.

    Two different arenas. You wouldn't catch me saying Toney would KO Lennox LEwis...ever.
    I realize that.

    I was only talking about the face hurting part.



    Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

    Comment

    • oldgringo
      Ellis
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2004
      • 12747
      • 968
      • 453
      • 30,064

      #62
      Originally posted by RunWithKnives
      I realize that.

      I was only talking about the face hurting part.

      Sure, but theres a much higher chance of Toney beating Wlad that Wlad beating Lewis.

      Wasn't there a Toney/Wlad poll taken not so long ago?

      Comment

      • Run
        Outlaw
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 56190
        • 2,588
        • 4,569
        • 76,412

        #63
        Originally posted by oldgringo
        Wasn't there a Toney/Wlad poll taken not so long ago?
        Yeah.

        Also keep in mind that poll was created shortly after Toney's victory over Guinn and people were excited.

        Couple that with the outrageous number of people that hate Wlad and you have the makings of a biased poll. Most people that hate Wlad will vote for Pacman to K.O. him in 2.

        The numbers were virtually even.

        Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!




        Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

        Comment

        • Easy-E
          Gotta want it
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22686
          • 865
          • 1,743
          • 32,777

          #64
          Originally posted by RunWithKnives
          Either way, people's opinions are really hard to fathom, and differ seriously.

          Like you say Toney would have little trouble beating Wlad.

          I think that hurts my face. Wlad would kill that fat midget.
          based on what?
          toney is probably the most talented hw today.
          wlads last outing against peter was pathetic

          Comment

          • j
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2003
            • 4694
            • 210
            • 26
            • 11,831

            #65
            it's always fun to see people take other people's opinions so seriously. especially when they are completely unsubstantiated by factual evidence.

            shouldn't this be more of a discussion than an argument, since the fight never actually happened?

            Comment

            • Run
              Outlaw
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2005
              • 56190
              • 2,588
              • 4,569
              • 76,412

              #66
              Originally posted by PBF34
              wlads last outing against peter was pathetic
              You are talking like Peter was complete garbage.

              Right before the fight he was supposed to be the future of the heavweight division, was the hardest puncher in the past 20 years, and had the style to give Wlad trouble.



              Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

              Comment

              • Run
                Outlaw
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2005
                • 56190
                • 2,588
                • 4,569
                • 76,412

                #67
                Originally posted by j
                it's always fun to see people take other people's opinions so seriously. especially when they are completely unsubstantiated by factual evidence.

                shouldn't this be more of a discussion than an argument, since the fight never actually happened?
                No ****ing ****.

                I was about to post the exact same thing. Everyone here acts like they are certain of something when they have no idea what the hell they are talking about.



                Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                Comment

                • Super_Lightweight
                  Jesus of Nazareth P4P
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 7746
                  • 452
                  • 556
                  • 15,482

                  #68
                  hmm

                  Peter is not James Toney. Peter can almost look Wlad in the eye whereas Toney can look Wlad in the *******. Peter has serious power at heavyweight, Toney does not.

                  Basically, Toney will easily lose to Wlad if they fight. I'd bet all my points on that. Toney is better p4p. He loses to the skilled giant though.

                  Comment

                  • oldgringo
                    Ellis
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 12747
                    • 968
                    • 453
                    • 30,064

                    #69
                    Originally posted by j
                    it's always fun to see people take other people's opinions so seriously. especially when they are completely unsubstantiated by factual evidence.

                    shouldn't this be more of a discussion than an argument, since the fight never actually happened?

                    Whats wrong with argument with no malicious intent behind it? That's just about what I've seen here...nobody is throwing around names, me and knives are arguing like civil people.

                    Comment

                    • Run
                      Outlaw
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 56190
                      • 2,588
                      • 4,569
                      • 76,412

                      #70
                      Originally posted by oldgringo
                      Whats wrong with argument with no malicious intent behind it? That's just about what I've seen here...nobody is throwing around names, me and knives are arguing like civil people.

                      A good example of what he is talking about....is how I got attacked by other posters simply by posting my opinion earlier in this thread.

                      Instead of them responding civil IE "I dont agree"

                      It was more like "You are so ******, **** YOU, I HATE YOU".



                      Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP