DO you give floyd credit for dominating Jmm?

[Joe2608]

I give him credit, both are master tacticians but clearly Floyd's style was all wrong for Marquez. I don't think the weight was the biggest issue it was the style of both fighters. Last night proved the weight debate is a load of rubbish because Marquez outboxed arguably the P4P No.1 fighter in the world who is a regular at that weight. Floyd was just a class above.

[SyrianUser]

yeah, i give him credit for beating marquez.

Don't like him cheating at the weight when all odds were already on his favor though. He could have easily beaten marquez even without it, just like he could have easily beaten oriz without resorting to the sucker punch.

Cool you are a honest Pacquiao fan .



All the other *******s who voted no are still crying because their darling STRUGGLED and LOST to a 38 YEAR OLD LIGHTWEIGHT .

[Main Source]

JMM never fought above 135 maybe had soemthing to do with it?Floyd does deserve credit but JMM looked mighty sluggish at ww which is why its annoying to see MP exploit this to a lesser extent

Now that's BS. I'm not sold by that statement.

The JMM who fought against Mayweather wasn't more "out of shape", "sluggish" or "bloated" than the version who fought Pacquiao last night. Mayweather made a great fighter look very ordinary. And let me remind you that Floyd's fight with JMM took place 2009 and Floyd came from a 21 month layoff.

Who can take 21 months off, dominate a great fighter and show no signs of ring rust?

Bottom line is, if you won't give Floyd props for his win in dominating fashion over JMM in 2009, then how can you give credit to Manny for his, controversial, win last night?