Video: Floyd was losing the 4th round.

[D4thincarnation]

Not to mention when they were in the corner vic missed most of the shots. Lampley just decided he was going to say Vic was landing to make the viewers think he was in the fight when he clearly wasn't.

Landing 9 of 27 punches is winning a round?

D4thincarnation, no offense, but you absolutely said jabs didn't count when assessing floyd's connect percentage versus manny's when you created the manny is more accurate than floyd thread.

Yes the jabs percentage when used by compubox does not tell the whole story because the jab can be used for a variety of things not just for scoring punches.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=509928

Why do you think Floyd's jab was so poor against Ortiz? Only 14% connects

[Canelo Phresh]

yes the jabs percentage when used by compubox does not tell the whole story because the jab can be used for a variety of things not just for scoring punches.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=509928

why do you think floyd's jab was so poor against ortiz? Only 14% connects

ignoring the truth would be better than defending chosen mental ******ation.

[The Big Dunn]

Yes the jabs percentage when used by compubox does not tell the whole story because the jab can be used for a variety of things not just for scoring punches.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=509928

Why do you think Floyd's jab was so poor against Ortiz? Only 14% connects

Dude let it go. Manny is not more accurate then floyd. The post was crazy and your arguments to defend it were really ******, despite you having more knowledge than most on this board.

Like the 4th round, Vic wasn't winning, he just looked better than he did rds 1-3. We get it, you are a manny fan. But don't be a floyd hater more than a manny fan.

[D4thincarnation]

ignoring the truth would be better than defending chosen mental ******ation.

Have you chose to ignore the truth?

[Canelo Phresh]

have you chose to ignore the truth?

because an orthodox straight right is better than a jab against a southpaw. I also mentioned this in your jab hate thread. Go back to the Drawing board you ******* wyle e. Coyote. Aka jdc.

[D4thincarnation]

Dude let it go. Manny is not more accurate then floyd. The post was crazy and your arguments to defend it were really ******, despite you having more knowledge than most on this board.

Like the 4th round, Vic wasn't winning, he just looked better than he did rds 1-3. We get it, you are a manny fan. But don't be a floyd hater more than a manny fan.

If so explain to me why Floyd's jab percentage was so poor against Ortiz? Is it because he has a poor jab or is there another reason?

[D4thincarnation]

because an orthodox straight right is better than a jab against a southpaw. I also mentioned this in your jab hate thread. Go back to the Drawing board you ******* wyle e. Coyote. Aka jdc.

Ok so when a southpaw faces a orthadox fighter his straight left will be better as well.

Do you agree with that.

[Canelo Phresh]

if so explain to me why floyd's jab percentage was so poor against ortiz? Is it because he has a poor jab or is there another reason?

are you an idiot? An orthodox straight right lands more than a jab against a southpaw. You really are the ******* wyle e. Coyote. And every ***** is the road runner.

[The Big Dunn]

If so explain to me why Floyd's jab percentage was so poor against Ortiz? Is it because he has a poor jab or is there another reason?

I saw that thread, my gues would be because he was leading, landing straight right hands. In all honesty, I thought earner's post, #4, really answered this question best.

[Canelo Phresh]

ok so when a southpaw faces a orthadox fighter his straight left will be better as well.

Do you agree with that.

yes.............. Now will you stop jdc.