Numbers Dont Lie: Mayweather vs Ortiz Compubox

[SkillspayBills]

I told everyone 2 days ago. Look at Ortiz's punch output. He usually punches 60 per round. If He is in the low 40s to high 30s I guarantee you he gets TKO'd because he is fighting Floyd's fight.

[joesaiditstrue]

"Ortiz was winning round 4!!!!"

****ing comical.

Mayweather won every single round clearly.

floyd threw 67 punches in rd4, he was bringin it to that boy

[Larry the boss]

how people gave him any round is beyond me..i saw a 1 sided ass whooping..with ortiz landing a couple good shots but nothing to follow it up

[Larry the boss]

after 4 rounds

[Guest]

money may tax dat ass these numbers just back up what every saw
floyd was letting his hands go member that 7 punch combo...havent seen him do that
in a while..since chop chop corley

[bojangles1987]

"Ortiz was winning round 4!!!!"

****ing comical.

Mayweather won every single round clearly.

Did you hear that crowd? Of course Ortiz was winning round 4.

Er, maybe not.

[Champ Is Here]

Comedian always owning dudes

Round 4 he lost clearly cause he UFC'd May and he got knocked out

[IronDanHamza]

Did you hear that crowd? Of course Ortiz was winning round 4.

Er, maybe not.

I just watched the HBO broadcast and what the **** is wrong with Jim Lampley having an ****** every time Ortiz missed a punch?

At one point, no word of a life, Mayweather landed a clean right hand and Lampley went 'Left hand by Ortiz!'



I can't see how any round could have gone to Ortiz.

A poster said all the judges had it 3-0 to Mayweather I don't know if that's true but I imagine and hope it is.

[hugh grant]

Who cares that Floyd won the first few rounds, this is a 12 round fight?. And with Floyd not having fought much his ring fitness is in question. Plus he was throwing more punches than usual so i think Floyd would have tired more than usual down the home stretch.

[Brother Jay]

did I disagree with any of that?

Im just saying **** compubox and never use it for judging.

LOL @ fcuk compubox.

Because those numbers are completely true but misleading.

LOL@ the comedy on this site.

Like I've said from the beginning, barring any knockdowns or knockouts, compubox is absolutely the best way to gauge what was happening.

What Steak is suggesting is that if Fighter A is catching Fighter B for 95% of the round with 50 potshots, and in the last 10 seconds Fighter B lands 2 thunderous right hands, Fighter B should win the round.

Because if that's not what you're suggesting, then you aren't suggesting anything at all.

Boxing has a scoring system. Compubox was created with that scoring system in mind and is meant to compliment that scoring system. It isn't meant to be used solely as a scorecard. No one ever suggested that it should be.

It can be used however to get a feel of who was the aggressor, who landed more often, and who tried to be busy but was made to miss. That counts for alot.

BTW Steak, if a fighter gets hit but is not knocked down, his opponent doesn't deserve special consideration for hurting him. There is no "hurt factor" in boxing despite what you might hear Jim Lampley say. A harder punch that doesn't pay dividends might as well be a jab.

Apparently, you've been duped into believing that the harder shots should count more. If that were true, there's no way that Shavers, Foreman or Tyson could have ever lost. That's a falsehood. Punches landed are punches landed. A knockdown is 2 points. A knockout wins a fight.

That's it. Its just that fans who think that they know more than they really do outsmart themselves by trying to rewrite the rules in their own minds.

I'd take compubox's stats over the judges who scored the win for Williams over Lara anyday!