Harry Carpenter's ten ten all-time heavyweights (greatest and best)

[Easy-E]

Well Tyson was world champion in 1986, 10 years later he was world champion, 16 years later he was fighting for the world title.

are you trying to claim mike tyson had longevity??
if you are, thats a ****** statement

i wouldnt bring up tyson fighting for a championship in 2002, he got knocked out by lewis, in 1996, he wont the championship from frank bruno, then vacated so he wouldnt have to fight lewis. he then won a championship from bruce seldon and then his NEXT fight, evander beat him up, then they fought again, and evander beat him up again. he didnt get another title shot until the lewis one.

from 86-90 he was a champ, was a champ for about half on 96, then preceeded to lose every shot he had after that
supreme talent?
yes
longevity?
absolutly not

[JUYJUY]

are you trying to claim mike tyson had longevity??

No, I'm trying to claim that Lennox Lewis didn't have much longevity. He was only ever dominant in the year 2000 for three fights, big deal.

[!!! Beowulf !!!]

No, I'm trying to claim that Lennox Lewis didn't have much longevity. He was only ever dominant in the year 2000 for three fights, big deal.

Even without considering his stellar amateur career, Lennox Lewis had a long, rewarding and great career and was the Greatest heavyweight of the last decade and a half.

[Easy-E]

No, I'm trying to claim that Lennox Lewis didn't have much longevity. He was only ever dominant in the year 2000 for three fights, big deal.

you used mike as a compairson to lewis's longevitiy, which was not a good comparison