I'm going to try to milk this thread dry until it reach 10 pages. lol
Who are the current top five most versatile Boxers in Boxing?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.
How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.Comment
-
I should've added him in the place of Cotto. He can adjusts to any styles consistently unlike Cotto who has had trouble against pressure and volume puncher fighters.Comment
-
Because beating those fighters higlighted is better than beating Jean Pascal?Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.
How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.
Pretty self explanitory.
Age aside, they are still better wins than Jean Pascal.Comment
-
I don't need backup, have never asked for backup, and don't make sh** personal because you have an unpopular opinion that a lot of people disagree with.Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.
How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.
You're overrating Pascal himself, he is why that win isn't better than many of Floyd's best wins. Being the best in a division doesn't always mean that much. Hopkins beating him is only a notable accomplishment because of age, not the opponent. Even Natas and Walt and the other big Hopkins fans would tell you that.Comment
-
Because the 'best light-heavyweight' was a poor fighter. Floyd beat a great lightweight, that ****s on the Pascal win, as does his win over Corrales.Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.
How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.Comment
-
The most versatile fighter in the game is Andre S.O.G Ward
Other than him, id say
Floyd Mayweather, he moves so well, pot shots, fires in combination (when the occasion calls for it), fights in the pocket, off the ropes and backs bigger guys up.
Miguel Cotto is another well rounded versatile pro.
Gamboa seems to be able to do it all
Tim Bradley is solid in pretty much all areasLast edited by The Surgeon; 09-27-2011, 03:27 PM.Comment
-
Actually it isn't.
Mosley was shot,(I don't like to discredit that win),but you leave me no choice.
Castillo was not the best in the division, Floyd was.
Rip to Genero. But He was aging as well.
Pascal was prime, top fighter in his weightclass B-Hop was 46.Comment
Comment