Who are the current top five most versatile Boxers in Boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Carpe Diem
    Seize the day
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 16026
    • 1,235
    • 997
    • 44,413

    #51
    I'm going to try to milk this thread dry until it reach 10 pages. lol

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #52
      Originally posted by Carpe Diem
      I'm going to try to milk this thread dry until it reach 10 pages. lol
      We should start more arguments then. Bradley not being on anyone's list is bullcrap, you're ******ed if he's not.

      Comment

      • Bushbaby
        Wild Apache
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 23513
        • 727
        • 370
        • 32,078

        #53
        Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.

        How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.

        Comment

        • Carpe Diem
          Seize the day
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 16026
          • 1,235
          • 997
          • 44,413

          #54
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          We should start more arguments then. Bradley not being on anyone's list is bullcrap, you're ******ed if he's not.
          I should've added him in the place of Cotto. He can adjusts to any styles consistently unlike Cotto who has had trouble against pressure and volume puncher fighters.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49529
            • 5,035
            • 270
            • 104,043

            #55
            Originally posted by Bushbaby
            Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.

            How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.
            Because beating those fighters higlighted is better than beating Jean Pascal?

            Pretty self explanitory.

            Age aside, they are still better wins than Jean Pascal.

            Comment

            • goblin213
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 2938
              • 132
              • 138
              • 11,734

              #56
              Joseph Agbeko should be on everyone's list.

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #57
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.

                How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.
                I don't need backup, have never asked for backup, and don't make sh** personal because you have an unpopular opinion that a lot of people disagree with.

                You're overrating Pascal himself, he is why that win isn't better than many of Floyd's best wins. Being the best in a division doesn't always mean that much. Hopkins beating him is only a notable accomplishment because of age, not the opponent. Even Natas and Walt and the other big Hopkins fans would tell you that.

                Comment

                • RubenSonny
                  Lagos State of Mind
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 4747
                  • 287
                  • 388
                  • 11,330

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby
                  Aw Jangles, you waited for your entire hood to come in to post again? Typical. But when you factor in age, which I clearly did, none of those wins are better. B-Hop was 46 fighting the best lightheavy he litterally could have fathered. That's one of the greatest feats in the entire sport. matter of fact that win alone beats Floyd's relatively soft resume in it's entirety.

                  How is any win on Floyd's resume better than a 46 year old fighter beating the best lightheavyweight? I'd love some explinations.
                  Because the 'best light-heavyweight' was a poor fighter. Floyd beat a great lightweight, that ****s on the Pascal win, as does his win over Corrales.

                  Comment

                  • The Surgeon
                    Days Of Glory
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 15385
                    • 712
                    • 1,578
                    • 24,784

                    #59
                    The most versatile fighter in the game is Andre S.O.G Ward

                    Other than him, id say

                    Floyd Mayweather, he moves so well, pot shots, fires in combination (when the occasion calls for it), fights in the pocket, off the ropes and backs bigger guys up.

                    Miguel Cotto is another well rounded versatile pro.

                    Gamboa seems to be able to do it all

                    Tim Bradley is solid in pretty much all areas
                    Last edited by The Surgeon; 09-27-2011, 03:27 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Bushbaby
                      Wild Apache
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 23513
                      • 727
                      • 370
                      • 32,078

                      #60
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                      Because beating those fighters higlighted is better than beating Jean Pascal?

                      Pretty self explanitory.

                      Age aside, they are still better wins than Jean Pascal.
                      Actually it isn't.

                      Mosley was shot,(I don't like to discredit that win),but you leave me no choice.

                      Castillo was not the best in the division, Floyd was.

                      Rip to Genero. But He was aging as well.

                      Pascal was prime, top fighter in his weightclass B-Hop was 46.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP