TRUE OR FALSE: pacquiao has too many loses to be considered in ATG

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kagami Taiga
    Generation of Miracles
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 19078
    • 703
    • 228
    • 40,183

    #11
    thats just plain ******. boy ppl are on a roll with the threads today.

    Comment

    • Xyei
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 14260
      • 1,471
      • 2,605
      • 19,286

      #12
      Originally posted by peyk-peyk
      A potential ATG thread right here!


      Seriously though... This is a silly question. PAC has more than made up for his few losses. Definitely ATG material. No question about it.

      Comment

      • -Kev-
        this is boxing
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2006
        • 39960
        • 5,045
        • 1,449
        • 234,543

        #13
        Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
        losses define greatness


        But there's nothing great about getting KTFO multiple times against unknowns.

        Comment

        • Paclan
          Banned
          • Feb 2011
          • 2824
          • 151
          • 61
          • 3,310

          #14
          True- Only undefeated fighters can be ATG's

          maybe one or two losses is acceptable, but definately not 3

          Comment

          • Canelo Phresh
            LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2010
            • 13714
            • 829
            • 1,353
            • 23,724

            #15
            Originally posted by Larryx2011
            is this **** thread day??????????


            naw this pistol whip classic is the ****thread of the day but this is a contender.

            Comment

            • Paclan
              Banned
              • Feb 2011
              • 2824
              • 151
              • 61
              • 3,310

              #16
              Originally posted by -Kev-
              But there's nothing great about getting KTFO multiple times against unknowns.
              Pacquiao wasn't even sexually mature yet when he got knocked out

              Comment

              • -Kev-
                this is boxing
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 39960
                • 5,045
                • 1,449
                • 234,543

                #17
                The standards for being great have lowered considerably. Soon the top 10 ATG will be completely changed with new fighters.

                Comment

                • Spit Venom
                  Hard Luck Man
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2011
                  • 241
                  • 25
                  • 12
                  • 6,335

                  #18
                  Originally posted by RoidRage
                  What does Mayweather have to do with this topic? If I started a topic asking if Morales had too many loses would you have responded the same way?
                  u kiddin me, it was at the beginning of his career and he was a skinny teeny...
                  Originally posted by -Kev-
                  He has too many losses against unknown guys. 2 is too much.

                  It's okay to have losses, but it better be against greats or at least good fighters. For example his loss against Morales is okay because Morales is a great. But the Singsurat and Torrecampo losses are shameful.
                  um, jes.

                  undeafted= unproven. its a rule. didnt want to pick sven otke since its too obvious.

                  Comment

                  • dosepulgada
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 320
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    • 6,393

                    #19
                    definitely false. A lot of fighters have 0 L in their resume but most of them has the remote possibility being an ATG.

                    pacquiao has to be considered as one of the GoATs. Only floydiots doesn't believe that.
                    Last edited by dosepulgada; 09-13-2011, 06:20 PM.

                    Comment

                    • -Kev-
                      this is boxing
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 39960
                      • 5,045
                      • 1,449
                      • 234,543

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Paclan
                      Pacquiao wasn't even sexually mature yet when he got knocked out
                      Age is a bad excuse. How old you think Benitez was when he lost a 15 round decision to top 10 ATG Sugar Ray Loenard?


                      Inexperience is more like it. Don't use age as an excuse.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP