TRUE OR FALSE: pacquiao has too many loses to be considered in ATG

**AntonTheMeh** · 09-13-2011, 05:51 PM

false........

**SplitSecond** · 09-13-2011, 05:52 PM

most definitely, robinson also has too many loses to be considred atg
as does ali, as does hopkins, as does every so called "ATG" basically

the only true ATG's are:
floyd mayweather
sven ottke
joe calzaghe
and co

**Perfect Plex** · 09-13-2011, 05:53 PM

Come on MODS remove this ****. You remove alot better threads than this.

**peyk-peyk** · 09-13-2011, 05:53 PM

A potential ATG thread right here!

**Larry the boss** · 09-13-2011, 05:54 PM

is this **** thread day??????????

**Spit Venom** · 09-13-2011, 05:54 PM

I think Mayweather (with all due respect) has far too few defeats to be called an ATG.

**Canelo Phresh** · 09-13-2011, 05:56 PM

losses define greatness

**-Kev-** · 09-13-2011, 05:56 PM

He has too many losses against unknown guys. 2 is too much.

It's okay to have losses, but it better be against greats or at least good fighters. For example his loss against Morales is okay because Morales is a great. But the Singsurat and Torrecampo losses are shameful.

**RoidRage** · 09-13-2011, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by Spit Venom

I think Mayweather (with all due respect) has far too few defeats to be called an ATG.

What does Mayweather have to do with this topic? If I started a topic asking if Morales had too many loses would you have responded the same way?

TRUE OR FALSE: pacquiao has too many loses to be considered in ATG