Prescott Clearly beat McCloskey

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43474
    • 4,553
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #21
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Oh what a surprise. I never expected this point of view from you!
    i just watched the round again. mccloskey landed some decent punches but prescott landed more clean shots throughout the entire round. bigger and harder shots that snapped mccloskey's head back. most of mccloskey's punches were missed or blocked and mccloskey was hurt in the last 30 seconds where prescott never was. clear round for prescott. remember just moving your hands is not a scoring criteria. landing punches is far more important.

    Last edited by daggum; 09-11-2011, 04:11 PM.

    Comment

    • uoykcuf
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2011
      • 4597
      • 114
      • 157
      • 5,044

      #22
      I think so too.

      Comment

      • Spray_resistant
        Vacant interim regular(C)
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 29238
        • 2,745
        • 1,453
        • 53,384

        #23
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Totally agree. McCloskey won the first 2 minutes of the 12th. Unfortunately people seem to only remember the ends of rounds when, if anything, McCloskey had punched himself out.

        I think it shouldve been a draw. Prescott dominated the first half. McCloskey came back in the second. They should just rematch.
        The last round was close and competitive with alot of sloppiness by both fighters then for whatever reason McCloskey stopped doing anything and Prescott just got on him for that entire stretch, pretty simple stuff here.

        Comment

        • mushahadeen
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 7964
          • 384
          • 321
          • 8,800

          #24
          that's y u never fight on somebody else's turf. just too easy 4 the judges to be either A) corrupt or B) unduly influenced by crowd reaction.

          exact reason why vanes didn't go to mexico.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #25
            Originally posted by daggum
            i just watched the round again. mccloskey landed some decent punches but prescott landed more clean shots throughout the entire round. bigger and harder shots that snapped mccloskey's head back. most of mccloskey's punches were missed or blocked and mccloskey was hurt in the last 30 seconds where prescott never was. clear round for prescott. remember just moving your hands is not a scoring criteria. landing punches is far more important.

            Im well aware of the scoring criteria. McCloskey outlanded him for the first 2 and half minutes of the round.

            Comment

            • daggum
              All time great
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 43474
              • 4,553
              • 3
              • 166,270

              #26
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Im well aware of the scoring criteria. McCloskey outlanded him for the first 2 and half minutes of the round.
              you scored hopkins-calzaghe for calzaghe so i'm not sure you are aware since you state faking low blows and holding as reasons hopkins lost. was mccloskey landing more clean punches? no. he threw more but prescott was landing the cleaner punches. punches on prescotts elbows and gloves aren't clean punches no matter how badly you want them to be. some of his punches partially got through which makes the round somewhat close but prescott dominated the last 30 seconds which secured a somewhat close round into a clear round for him.
              Last edited by daggum; 09-11-2011, 04:59 PM.

              Comment

              • *Khan
                Banned
                • Feb 2011
                • 2479
                • 135
                • 244
                • 3,193

                #27
                I had it 10 rounds for Prescott, 1 for McCloskey and 1 even. And Prescott had that knockdown in his favor in the first. Honestly round fater round Prescott cracked McCloskey with hard jabs and straight rights which had McCloskeys face all marked up.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #28
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  you scored hopkins-calzaghe for calzaghe so i'm not sure you are aware since you state faking low blows and holding as reasons hopkins lost. was mccloskey landing more clean punches? no. he threw more but prescott was landing the cleaner punches. punches on prescotts elbows and gloves aren't clean punches no matter how badly you want them to be. some of his punches partially got through which makes the round somewhat close but prescott dominated the last 30 seconds which secured a somewhat close round into a clear round for him.
                  Zzzzz you relate everything to Hopkins-Calzaghe. It is your only point of reference. I bet you scream about that fight in bed. Its not like you were gonna say anything else about this fight if it went to the scorecards.

                  Comment

                  • *Khan
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 2479
                    • 135
                    • 244
                    • 3,193

                    #29
                    I'd say McCloskey landed what about 5 hard punches while Prescott would land about 10-15 per round. This fight was not even close. Don't listen to anyone who said it was close, it wasn't. At all. Boxing is about winning a fight. You win a fight by beating up your opponent, not by staring, feinting and backing up your opponent without throwing punches like McCloskey did to Prescott.

                    Comment

                    • daggum
                      All time great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 43474
                      • 4,553
                      • 3
                      • 166,270

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Zzzzz you relate everything to Hopkins-Calzaghe. It is your only point of reference. I bet you scream about that fight in bed. Its not like you were gonna say anything else about this fight if it went to the scorecards.
                      because it's the perfect example of how judging has gone wrong in boxing. clean punches, defense, and trapping your opponent has been overruled with ineffective aggression and sheer volume.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP