Originally posted by Tha_Greatest
Ring Magazine is ******ed!
Collapse
-
but the people that MATTER, the judges, said that taylor won...they have to go by that. They cant overrule the official call and just put up what they prefer, which is what I like about them. You can probably bet they didnt like having to do that, but taylor won so thats the way it is. -
theyve been around longer than you and have seen a lot more than you have. this leaves you no room to call them idiots.Originally posted by Tha_GreatestMost their staff tought Hopkins won, but have Taylor higher than Hopkins...What a bunch of idiots!Comment
-
Originally posted by TheEvilSainttheyve been around longer than you and have seen a lot more than you have. this leaves you no room to call them idiots.
I dont think Ring is bunch of ******s, I love the magazine but what you just wrote sets a dangerous precident!
For example my grandpa is one old clueless **** but he has been around longer then me and he has seen more then me...do you understand son?Comment
-
Originally posted by tracyleebut the people that MATTER, the judges, said that taylor won...they have to go by that. They cant overrule the official call and just put up what they prefer, which is what I like about them. You can probably bet they didnt like having to do that, but taylor won so thats the way it is.
Yes that's right. Irregardless how the Rig MAG STAFF saw that fight, officially B-HOPS lost so they can't rate B-HOPS higher than Taylor. It is that simple, so stop the HATING and CURSING.
Comment
-
There is a good article about this very subject written by Nigel Collins on the second or third page of latest issue with Lacy on the cover.....I will see if I can find it and post it.Originally posted by Tha_GreatestMost their staff tought Hopkins won, but have Taylor higher than Hopkins...What a bunch of idiots!Comment
-
The British-based boxing magazine "Boxing Monthly" beats the Ring Magazine by a mile. Better pictures, better writers, looks better from inside out, it's not even close.Comment
-
but hes not referring to clueless ****s...hes referring to professionals who have been around for a long time and know the sport wellOriginally posted by scapI dont think Ring is bunch of ******s, I love the magazine but what you just wrote sets a dangerous precident!
For example my grandpa is one old clueless **** but he has been around longer then me and he has seen more then me...do you understand son?Comment
-
Rings magazine has BHOP winning against Taylor. But according to them, even if they(Rings) scored the win for BHOP, they still respect the decision of the judges giving the decision to Taylor. Thats the reason Taylor is rank higher than BHOP.
This has happened before. The Barrera-Morales 2 fight, Rings gave the win to Morales. But the judges gave the win to Barrera. Making Barrera the #1 instead of Morales.
End of Post.Comment
-
ur granpa is one man. these people are experts who KNOW what they see when they see it. they know greatness, they know whos good, who sucks, whos hot, whos not, whos a contender, whos a pretender. the ring magazine belt is the most prized title in boxing simply because thats when one of the oldest and most knowledgable magazines portrays you as the best in ur class or in the world.Originally posted by scapI dont think Ring is bunch of ******s, I love the magazine but what you just wrote sets a dangerous precident!
For example my grandpa is one old clueless **** but he has been around longer then me and he has seen more then me...do you understand son?
they know boxing.Comment
-
Comment