Comments Thread For: Marquez: No Weight Issue, I Will Beat Pacquiao..Again

[LeadUppercut]

**** are you on..he should talk **** and go fight his heart out,**** Manny

Huh ?

Careful, you just broke the manny rules, you are not allowed to do that.

Marquez should have been respectful, and humble, and he must learn to touch gloves before every round.

[indystress]

ok, i want to know how does marquez have pacs number when marquez lost their first two fights? aslo, the pac that fought marquez twice back then is no longer that same pac...the current pac is a thinking boxer first, uses his jabs more, darts in and out, going side to side, while using his left and right...on the other hand, marquez of the past that fought pac is still the same marquez, but older...his style and technique has never changed.

so to say marquez have pacs number is very outdated...how do you/we know that the same old marquez's style will give the new and improved pac problems? even katsidis gave marquez a run for the money til it ended...and pac is no katsidis.

a much naturally bigger fraud couldnt stop marquez...i see pac (being of basically the same size as marquez on fight nite) ending this fight via TKO or KO

[Larry the boss]

Huh ?

Careful, you just broke the manny rules, you are not allowed to do that.

Marquez should have been respectful, and humble, and he must learn to touch gloves before every round.

These posters are crazy..he should thank Manny??wtf???this is ridiculous

[LeadUppercut]

ok, i want to know how does marquez have pacs number when marquez lost their first two fights? aslo, the pac that fought marquez twice back then is no longer that same pac...the current pac is a thinking boxer first, uses his jabs more, darts in and out, going side to side, while using his left and right...on the other hand, marquez of the past that fought pac is still the same marquez, but older...his style and technique has never changed.

so to say marquez have pacs number is very outdated...how do you/we know that the same old marquez's style will give the new and improved pac problems? even katsidis gave marquez a run for the money til it ended...and pac is no katsidis.

a much naturally bigger fraud couldnt stop marquez...i see pac (being of basically the same size as marquez on fight nite) ending this fight via TKO or KO

Sure dude, and Williams just beat Lara.

Most analysts think that Marquez won both fights, but THE ENTIRE DEVELOPED WORLD knows that he won the second.

Blah, blah..... shoulda been 10-6..... blah, blah.

Manny should have been disqualified, or at least had a point deducted, for hitting Marquez while he was on the deck.

Also, I dont give a toss about that technicality. Pacquiao knocked Marquez down three times and broke his nose..... and yet STILL couldnt beat him.

" we all know who won the fight, Pacquiao got a boxing lesson "
~ FMj

[BTL]

This fight is gonna be electric.

[apunchnotseen]

The second fight is general consensus a Marquez win, the first was close. Juan getting off the floor in the second fight was unbelievable, maybe the best punch I ever seen not end a fight. Pac can knock anyone out with juan exception.

[boxer.exposed]

Yep and get run over on the power side , to match the strength he must weigh close to the same and then he will lose speed , JMM is between a rock and a hard place at this weight when it concerns Pac , Roach has not been matching Manny at all these CWs for nothing its very smart match making where they can gain an advantage and the average fan has no clue thinking what can a pound or 2 do , well at this level with F1 athletes it matters and Roach knows it , the vast majority of fans have no clue about weight and making weight , but in spite of that it amazes me that Roach is steadfast on these CWs or no fight and armchair fans think its just for nothing .

Average fan has no clue thinking what a pound or 2 can do? You think Floyd did it in purpose when he came 2 lbs overweight against Marquez?

[indystress]

Sure dude, and Williams just beat Lara.

Most analysts think that Marquez won both fights, but THE ENTIRE DEVELOPED WORLD knows that he won the second.

Blah, blah..... shoulda been 10-6..... blah, blah.

Manny should have been disqualified, or at least had a point deducted, for hitting Marquez while he was on the deck.

Also, I dont give a toss about that technicality. Pacquiao knocked Marquez down three times and broke his nose..... and yet STILL couldnt beat him.

" we all know who won the fight, Pacquiao got a boxing lesson "
~ FMj

who are these "most analyst"?

marquez/pac 1 compubox stat
- marquez outlanded pac in rounds:
3 (+3)
5 (+7)
6 (+11)
8 (+3)
9 (+1)
11 (+2)
total = 60-54 marquez for these rounds

- pac outlanded marquez in rounds:
1 (3 knock down)
2 (+10)
7 (+3)
10 (+6)
total = 40-33 pac for these rounds

two rounds had both landing same amount in rounds 4 and 12...so these are basically 10-10 round

MARQUEZ: add 60 + 33 + 20 (for two even rounds) = 113
PAC: add 54 + 40 + 20 (for two even rounds) = 114

as you can see, if you scored it by who won what rounds, pac shouldve won 114-113 if it werent for the judge that scored it 10-7...yes its true that marquez 6 rounds to 4 with two even rounds...but the 3 knockdowns were the difference


marquez/pac 2 compubox stat:
- marquez outland pac in rounds:
2 (+9)
5 (+2)
7 (+3)
8 (+16)
12 (+4)
total = 50-45 marquez for these rounds

- pac outlanded marquez in rounds:
1 (+6)
4 (+5)
6 (+1)
9 (+1)
10 (+2)
11 (+4)
total = 60-54

there were one round where both landed the same amount, which happened in round 3...the KD gave pac that round @ 10-8

MARQUEZ: add 50 + 54 + 8 (for being KD in round 3) = 112
PAC: add 60 + 45 + 10 = 115

as you can see, if you scored it by who won which rounds, pac won the second fight by a score of 115-112, as correctly scored by one judge...the other judge had it 115-112 for marquez...how did he come to that conclusion? this must be the same judge that scored fraud the winner vs castillo #1, HAHAHA...what a joke of a judge this guy is...115-112 for marquez? yah right, my azzz!!!

so to say marquez won both fights is ridiculous...only haters would say that...as for the media think marquez won...who are these media? because alot of media said that same thing....that pac won...BUT PAC WON BOTH if not for the first fight, which had a scoring error...without the scoring error of 10-7, which shouldve been 10-6, pac wouldve been 2-0 vs marquez, not 1-1

the first fight was close, the second fight pac put some distance between him and marquez...in #3, i see pac even doing more the next time around, being that it will not be the same pac of back then, while the current marquez is the same ol marquez of the past.

so in 24 rounds, marquez won 11 rounds, pac won 11 rounds, 2 rounds were even. again, the 4 knockdowns were the difference...if marquez didnt get knockdown in fight 1, he wouldve won...if he werent knockdown in fight #2, it wouldve been a draw...

so shut TFU marquez and deal with it!!! u :wank:

[street bully]

who are these "most analyst"?

marquez/pac 1 compubox stat
- marquez outlanded pac in rounds:
3 (+3)
5 (+7)
6 (+11)
8 (+3)
9 (+1)
11 (+2)
total = 60-54 marquez for these rounds

- pac outlanded marquez in rounds:
1 (3 knock down)
2 (+10)
7 (+3)
10 (+6)
total = 40-33 pac for these rounds

two rounds had both landing same amount in rounds 4 and 12...so these are basically 10-10 round

MARQUEZ: add 60 + 33 + 20 (for two even rounds) = 113
PAC: add 54 + 40 + 20 (for two even rounds) = 114

as you can see, if you scored it by who won what rounds, pac shouldve won 114-113 if it werent for the judge that scored it 10-7...yes its true that marquez 6 rounds to 4 with two even rounds...but the 3 knockdowns were the difference


marquez/pac 2 compubox stat:
- marquez outland pac in rounds:
2 (+9)
5 (+2)
7 (+3)
8 (+16)
12 (+4)
total = 50-45 marquez for these rounds

- pac outlanded marquez in rounds:
1 (+6)
4 (+5)
6 (+1)
9 (+1)
10 (+2)
11 (+4)
total = 60-54

there were one round where both landed the same amount, which happened in round 3...the KD gave pac that round @ 10-8

MARQUEZ: add 50 + 54 + 8 (for being KD in round 3) = 112
PAC: add 60 + 45 + 10 = 115

as you can see, if you scored it by who won which rounds, pac won the second fight by a score of 115-112, as correctly scored by one judge...the other judge had it 115-112 for marquez...how did he come to that conclusion?

so to say marquez won both fights is ridiculous...only haters would say that...as for the media think marquez won...who are these media? because alot of media said that same thing....that pac won...BUT PAC WON BOTH if not for the first fight, which had a scoring error...without the scoring error of 10-7, which shouldve been 10-6, pac wouldve been 2-0 vs marquez, not 1-1

the first fight was close, the second fight pac put some distance between him and marquez...in #3, i see pac even doing more the next time around, being that it will not be the same pac of back then, while the current marquez is the same ol marquez of the past.

so in 24 rounds, marquez won 11 rounds, pac won 11 rounds, 2 rounds were even. again, the 4 knockdowns were the difference...if marquez didnt get knockdown in fight 1, he wouldve won...if he werent knockdown in fight #2, it wouldve been a draw...

so shut TFU marquez and deal with it!!! u :wank:

Please gtfo with that compubox nonsense. Say what you want about the first fight, but the majority of the good posters here have been saying for years that marquez looked to have beat Pacquaio in the rematch. I had it 115-112 for marquez.

[Mr. Philadel]

Whether it's another classic war or a 2nd round KO, all I know is that Marquez will go out on his shield and not like a scared b*tch like Shane did. Pains me to say that since I always respected azucar, but that Filipino midget puts the fear of god into fighters.

or maybe Manny and Roach was the scared b!tches for NOT fighting him when he was still a lil' bit fresher...scared b!tches waited to see that the old warrior had nothing to offer....call a spade a ****in spade man!!!....I guess Ali was a scared b!tch in ya book against Holmes and Berbick as well huh?!?