Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

He has losses and isn't a PPV draw

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by True Class View Post
    He fought Mosley when he was 38 and out of the ring for 16 months.
    So it would've been better if he had've fought him a few months earlier? He still would've been 38 and the #1 Welterweight in the world, just like he was at the point when Floyd fought him. And Mosley was preparing for a fight in January '10 anyway with Berto, but it got cancelled. Ain't like he was coming from a retirement or anything. He was still active and seeking out fights.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by VETS View Post
      pacquiao fought mosley after he got his ass beat by mayweather and got a draw with mora and was 40 years old
      and? That has what to do with Floyd not fighting prime welterweights because he said they had losses and no drawing power? Nothing.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Player3 View Post
        So it would've been better if he had've fought him a few months earlier? He still would've been 38 and the #1 Welterweight in the world, just like he was at the point when Floyd fought him. And Mosley was preparing for a fight in January '10 anyway with Berto, but it got cancelled. Ain't like he was coming from a retirement or anything. He was still active and seeking out fights.


        No, it would have been better had he actually fought Margarito and Cotto, who were in their primes.

        But instead,

        he "retired". Then conveniently came back when neither was a threat anymore.

        Hardly a coincidence.

        Now, hes fighting a guy with losses, a guy who even got knocked out, and a guy who has never headlined his own PPV.

        How can he or those who subscribed to Floyds mantra of , "he has losses and isn't a draw", justify that?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by VETS View Post
          ortiz is bigger hits harder 10 years younger he has some advantages over him thats why its a good match up
          Sounds like Margarito a few years ago.

          and just like Ortiz today, "Margarito had losses and isn't a PPV draw".


          So, whats really the difference?

          Comment


          • #45
            Because Floyd is full of crap and I'm sure we all know it.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by True Class View Post
              No, it would have been better had he actually fought Margarito and Cotto, who were in their primes.
              No, it would've been better if these 2 fighters had showed some long term consistency (like Mayweather has) which would've set up an inevitable "megafight" somewhere down the line. But both fighters eventually got exposed for what they really were.

              Also "would have been better" and easier to make a fight with these 2 if Mayweather didn't have longstanding monetary disputes with their promoter.

              Don't you think Mayweather's financial issues with Arum was a major roadblock as well? Or do you conviently overlook this fact because it doesn't fit with your confirmation bias?

              Comment


              • #47
                cuz floyd is the ATG at ducking and dodgeing

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Player3 View Post
                  No, it would've been better if these 2 fighters had showed some long term consistency (like Mayweather has) which would've set up an inevitable "megafight" somewhere down the line. But both fighters eventually got exposed for what they really were.

                  Also "would have been better" and easier to make a fight with these 2 if Mayweather didn't have longstanding monetary disputes with their promoter.

                  Don't you think Mayweather's financial issues with Arum was a major roadblock as well? Or do you conviently overlook this fact because it doesn't fit with your confirmation bias?
                  Consistency?

                  As in taking on tough fights year after year?

                  Or consistency as in, quitting in a championship fight on HBO and having never headlined a PPV?


                  What qualities does Ortiz have for a megafight that Margarito and Cotto didn't?

                  None. He is the same fighter that has losses like Margarito and the same fighter with no drawing power like Cotto.


                  With Floyds standards, there is no way to justify this fight when he avoided two guys for being who Ortiz is today.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by True Class View Post
                    What qualities does Ortiz have for a megafight that Margarito and Cotto didn't?
                    None. All 3 are career paper champs.

                    A fight with Ortiz is far easier to make though because he has no monetary issues with Ortiz's promoter like he does with Cotto & Margarito's promoter.

                    BTW, Cotto's promoter Bob Arum never attempted to initiate negotiations with Mayweather for a fight with Cotto. Ever. He was content with Cotto fighting in the Top Rank Boxing League where he's able to pocket a percentage of both sides of the fighters purse.

                    If anybody's to blame for these fights not going down, it's Arum, Margarito & Cotto.

                    Arum, for being such a greedy bastard. And Cotto & Margarito for their lack of consistency.
                    Last edited by Deal With It; 08-29-2011, 12:14 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Player3 View Post
                      None.
                      So Floyds cherry picking again.

                      We know that. Hes been doing it since 2006.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP