Evander Holyfield's legacy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steak
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2006
    • 10713
    • 509
    • 268
    • 17,902

    #1

    Evander Holyfield's legacy

    Evander Holyfield is best known for his fights at Heavyweight, but also holds the title of being the best Cruiserweight of all time. Despite...


    Where do you rank Holyfield, and what do you think his legacy is?
    Do you consider him the best Cruiserweight of all time?
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49445
    • 5,022
    • 269
    • 104,043

    #2
    I consider him to be the greatest Crusierweight of all time.

    A Top 10 ATG Heavyweight.

    And an ATG in general. His resume is exceptional.

    Comment

    • Steak
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2006
      • 10713
      • 509
      • 268
      • 17,902

      #3
      Originally posted by IronDanHamza
      I consider him to be the greatest Crusierweight of all time.

      A Top 10 ATG Heavyweight.

      And an ATG in general. His resume is exceptional.
      frankly I dont see how there is any competition in terms of him being the best Cruiserweight of all time. He didnt stay there long, but he completely took it over and had some excellent wins there.

      #2 is up for debate though.

      Comment

      • GoogleMe
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 3459
        • 108
        • 145
        • 12,675

        #4
        Originally posted by Steak
        frankly I dont see how there is any competition in terms of him being the best Cruiserweight of all time. He didnt stay there long, but he completely took it over and had some excellent wins there.

        #2 is up for debate though.
        I think David Haye's resume is just as solid at CW as Holyfields'.

        Comment

        • Steak
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2006
          • 10713
          • 509
          • 268
          • 17,902

          #5
          Originally posted by GoogleMe
          I think David Haye's resume is just as solid at CW as Holyfields'.
          wins over Mormeck and Mac=wins over Qawix2, Tillman, Parkey, Ocasio, and DeLeon?

          Im going to heavily disagree.

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #6
            Huge Holyfield fan. I think he's clearly the best cruiserweight ever, beating even a past prime Qawi in your 14th or 15th fight is ridiculous.

            At heavyweight, I'd say he's easily top 10 and make an argument he's top 5.

            Comment

            • Expertise
              Banned
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Aug 2011
              • 80
              • 10
              • 2
              • 114

              #7
              Originally posted by Steak
              wins over Mormeck and Mac=wins over Qawix2, Tillman, Parkey, Ocasio, and DeLeon?

              Im going to heavily disagree.
              How come a win over Qawi, tillman, Parkey, ... is better than Haye's wins in cruiserweight. What are you basing your statement on?

              Or is it just cause Holyfield is a fighter from the past that he automatically is greater than Haye?

              Comment

              • Steak
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2006
                • 10713
                • 509
                • 268
                • 17,902

                #8
                Originally posted by Expertise
                How come a win over Qawi, tillman, Parkey, ... is better than Haye's wins in cruiserweight. What are you basing your statement on?

                Or is it just cause Holyfield is a fighter from the past that he automatically is greater than Haye?
                Or Perhaps because Holyfield had multiple wins over future/former title holders and arugably the 2nd best Cruiserweight of all time, beat more ranked opponents there, and did it more dominantly than Haye?

                Comment

                • jimmy1569
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 2920
                  • 114
                  • 0
                  • 3,083

                  #9
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  I consider him to be the greatest Crusierweight of all time.

                  A Top 10 ATG Heavyweight.

                  And an ATG in general. His resume is exceptional.
                  Straight to the point... good job!

                  Comment

                  • jimmy1569
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 2920
                    • 114
                    • 0
                    • 3,083

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Expertise
                    How come a win over Qawi, tillman, Parkey, ... is better than Haye's wins in cruiserweight. What are you basing your statement on?

                    Or is it just cause Holyfield is a fighter from the past that he automatically is greater than Haye?
                    Holyfield was undefeated going up to heavy & was UNDISPUTED CRUISERWEIGHT CHAMPION of all the belts.. he was NEVER knocked down going up to heavy & generally put that division on at least a small page of a map.. it's not because he was in the past.. he was better with fewer flaws & weaknesses.. better skills.. better chin....etc better personality & way more humble.. kapish!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP