Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I Won't Stay in Boxing For Long

[LeadUppercut]

you will be missed champ

we'll never see another pacman in our lifetime...... 8 div , 4 lineal?....no body is ever going to break that..

Just so you know......

If Pac was fighting under the original divisional system, with same-day weigh-ins, and only one title on the line, he would be no more than a 1-2 division champ.

But the thing is, he would have to actually beat the best in order to do it, so who knows ?

But no lineal champ bull****, he would have to beat the actual champ.

Oh for the days when nobody knew what a lineal champ was.

[puga]

Just so you know......

If Pac was fighting under the original divisional system, with same-day weigh-ins, and only one title on the line, he would be no more than a 1-2 division champ.

But the thing is, he would have to actually beat the best in order to do it, so who knows ?

But no lineal champ bull****, he would have to beat the actual champ.

Oh for the days when nobody knew what a lineal champ was.

wrong again....flweight, featherweight,lightweight,welterweight were all divison out of the orinal 8, meaning pac would still be a 4 divison champion out of the orignal 8...which is unheard of...

[straightleft]

Just so you know......

If Pac was fighting under the original divisional system, with same-day weigh-ins, and only one title on the line, he would be no more than a 1-2 division champ.

But the thing is, he would have to actually beat the best in order to do it, so who knows ?

But no lineal champ bull****, he would have to beat the actual champ.

Oh for the days when nobody knew what a lineal champ was.

WTF! What are yoi talking about? Pac would still be a 4 division champ. You don't know lineal champ?

[LeadUppercut]

wrong again....flweight, featherweight,lightweight,welterweight were all divison out of the orinal 8, meaning pac would still be a 4 divison champion out of the orignal 8...which is unheard of...

WTF! What are yoi talking about? Pac would still be a 4 division champ. You don't know lineal champ?

You non-boxing try-hards

Noobs, back in the day, there was no lineal, because we had a real champ.

Clowns.

Manny would have actually had to fight the best, not, the-man-who-beat-the-man, he would have had to fight as the smaller man, and he would have had to beat the real champion.

It is highly unlikely that Pacquiao would have beaten the genuine champion at flyweight or welter. Even today at welter Pacquiao has never fought anyone ranked as high as Ortiz, and to win a title at fw/lw he would have had to beat the real champion.

No way Pacquiao could have competed against genuine champions without catch-weights/manipulation/advantages, so I doubt that he would be more than a 2-division titlist, if that. Back in the day there was no cherry-picking easy titles by picking the weakest champion like Pac did at lightweight.

You kids are clowns the way you have attempted to re-write history.

[puga]

You non-boxing try-hards

Noobs, back in the day, there was no lineal, because we had a real champ.

Clowns.

Manny would have actually had to fight the best, not, the-man-who-beat-the-man, he would have had to fight as the smaller man, and he would have had to beat the real champion.

It is highly unlikely that Pacquiao would have beaten the genuine champion at flyweight or welter. Even today at welter Pacquiao has never fought anyone ranked as high as Ortiz, and to win a title at fw/lw he would have had to beat the real champion.

No way Pacquiao could have competed against genuine champions without catch-weights/manipulation/advantages, so I doubt that he would be more than a 2-division titlist, if that. Back in the day there was no cherry-picking easy titles by picking the weakest champion like Pac did at lightweight.

You kids are clowns the way you have attempted to re-write history.

man, it took your dumbass 16 damn hours to respond to simple posts and you have the nerve to call other noobs?...even if you went on to do your lil research you still sound like a pathetic sorry ass pissdrinker fan...

to say that it is highly unlikely for pac to have beaten the real champ is baseless given the skillset of fighters have back then is inferior to now...and that also depends on which timeline you are talking about when you say "back in the day"...how many weighclasses you think they have back in the early 20's and before that?...

nobody is re-writting histroy here, just statin facts...

[Elotero]

Great post.
However, don't expect to get a sensible response from Floyd fanatics.
What you will get at best are more of the same garbage; "take the test, take the test".

Garbage post and you agree with that Pacsexual bull****.

[tatangb45]

Mr. Wrong Uppercut I mean Lead Uppercut, wouldn't it be most satisfying to you and all the *****s if floyd would just drop the OSDT demand, fight Pac, embarras him, mutilate him and murder him in the ring, then you will all witness a mass suicide of all *******s, then all the world will witness all the *****s celebrating and experiencing never ending ****** until death? Pac's easy fight, much easier than Marquez, and Pac has absolutely NO repeat NO chance of beating him, with or without PEDS right? Easy fight, easy HUGE money right? Then why practically "ALLOW" Pac to to run away from the fight by refusing OSDT UP TO FIGHT NIGHT? Isn't it proper and most beneficial for you *****s to convince floyd to drop the demand, fight and kill pac in the ring? You know my intelligence is just so poor that I can't really comprehend the kind of logic floyd and *****s have. Perhaps, with your superior intelligence, you can explain it to me.

By the way calling Pac a fake fighter is something hard for me to believe from you, considering that you are a very knowledgeable boxing fan just like the boxing people in the mass media, the sports writers and the rest who have almost unanimously considered Pac ONE of the Greatest of this generation.

If Pac is indeed a hype-job, then kudos to all the people involved who has taken us all for a ride for quite so long.

Hey, Elotero, try using your brains for a change and respond to this post. Ask the assistance of Leaduppercut if you need some help. Maybe with your combined brains, you can finally come up with something worthwhile reading.

[LeadUppercut]

man, it took your dumbass 16 damn hours to respond to simple posts and you have the nerve to call other noobs?

Dont be an idiot. You think I can sit here all day and teach you about boxing ?

You are a non-boxing fanboy, so 16 hours is not actually long enough.

Arent they hilarious ?

Mayweather was picking on an old lightweight when he fought Marquez.

But Pacquiao is reaching for greatness

Pacland

If Manny " padded " Pacquiao fought under the original divisional system, back when there was only one champion, and using same-day weigh-ins..... he would likely only be a 1-2 division champion, if that.

He would not have won a title at fly or welter, and would have had to beat a genuine fw/lw champion without cherry-picking the easy road, and without manipulating advantages..... and he would have had to do it without whatever advantage he gets by refusing random blood tests.

If Pacquiao fought back in the time he may not even be hof-worthy, because he would have to fight genuine champions, because he would have to win those fights, he would have to do it as the smaller man, he would have to do it without disadvantaging them at negotiation, and he would have to do it without disadvantaging them on the scale.

They were real fighters, Pac is the " ****e Girls " of modern boxing.

Using 8oz gloves to win a vacant JMW title against a faded WW bum ?

Disgusting

[LeadUppercut]

to say that it is highly unlikely for pac to have beaten the real champ is baseless given the skillset of fighters have back then is inferior to now...and that also depends on which timeline you are talking about when you say "back in the day"...how many weighclasses you think they have back in the early 20's and before that?...

nobody is re-writting histroy here, just statin facts...

That is complete rubbish, and besides, Pacquiao's skill-set is limited, he gets by mostly on intangibles.

how many weighclasses you think they have back in the early 20's and before that?

Exactly the same, you moron, 8

nobody is re-writting histroy here, just statin facts...

No, you are making **** up and trying to " wing it ", as usual

[LeadUppercut]

Hey, Elotero, try using your brains for a change and respond to this post. Ask the assistance of Leaduppercut if you need some help. Maybe with your combined brains, you can finally come up with something worthwhile reading.

Why are you now attempting to push ridiculous excuses from others ?

Run out of your own ?

Mr. Wrong Uppercut I mean Lead Uppercut, wouldn't it be most satisfying to you and all the *****s if floyd would just drop the OSDT demand.

Dont be so ******.

FACT: blood tests are completely harmless.

It would be more satisfying to me if " padded " Pacquiao would grow up.

You are a fkn tool for insinuating that it is either easier, or more morally correct, for one guy to fight a somebody who could be using steroids, than for the other guy to take a harmless blood test.

Absurd rationale there from our residence pacfans