5 Major Reasons Manny Pacquiao Can Beat Floyd Mayweather

[skillswin]

All Manny has to do is throw 70 punches a round and he'll win by UD. Floyd's doesn't throw enough punches, people say he is in great shape which I'm sure he is but if you only throw 40-50 punches a round and stand in the pocket its pretty easy to keep your stamina. Even if Floyd lands 50% and Manny lands 30% of his punches but throws more than Floyd Manny will win off of nothing more than activity.

Manny will be able to take Floyds shots if he can take Cotto and Marg's shots. He never takes a break during the rounds and his head movement won't allow Floyd to land at will like it did against Marquez, Hatton and Mosley as neither of guys fight anything like Manny. Floyds only chance to win a fight against Manny IMO is a KO.

*******ation don't know limits......

[gatorDelux]

in a very close fight pac might get get the deison because he might throw more and get of first...

i would be dssapointed if the otcome of the fight was contravercial.

[Beater_of_ass]

*******ation don't know limits......

Again your ignorance shows, if Manny throws 70 and lands 30% of his punches its about the same as Floyd throwing 50 and landing half. So if the guys land the same amount who gets the round? Probably the guy who was more active and/or lands the harder punches. Its obvious who has more power and and who will be more active. Floyd isn't flawless you dumbass, just because you have a 0 doesn't mean you're perfect. The only reason the Oscar fight was close was because Oscar was active that plays a huge part in judging.

[skillswin]

Again your ignorance shows, if Manny throws 70 and lands 30% of his punches its about the same as Floyd throwing 50 and landing half. So if the guys land the same amount who gets the round? Probably the guy who was more active and/or lands the harder punches. Its obvious who has more power and and who will be more active. Floyd isn't flawless you dumbass, just because you have a 0 doesn't mean you're perfect. The only reason the Oscar fight was close was because Oscar was active that plays a huge part in judging.

pacquiao vs mosley Pac vs clottey.............

[gatorDelux]

dude jsut causea guy throws 70 and lands 30% on one fighter doesnt meen he will on another fighter....

u shouldnt use punchsats as a basis for your agrument of why one fighter beats another...

[daggum]

in a very close fight pac might get get the deison because he might throw more and get of first...

i would be dssapointed if the otcome of the fight was contravercial.

if it goes to decision *******s will say pac won and *****s will say floyd won so there's no real point unless someone scores a knockout.

[Beater_of_ass]

dude jsut causea guy throws 70 and lands 30% on one fighter doesnt meen he will on another fighter....

u shouldnt use punchsats as a basis for your agrument of why one fighter beats another...

Ok fine, who is say Floyd lands 50% on Manny? Because he's done it in other fights then he can't possibly do it to Manny. You're right, all the *****s are right. You can't use punch stats as a basis for an argument, with that then... Manny kills floyd with one punch, the first punch he throws in the fight because Manny never misses and he KO's with one punch in all his fights. My God you guys are idiots.

Pac vs Mosly and Clottey. What is your point that Manny won both fights and didn't lose a single round? Thanks for actually helping my argument. The Clottey fight is a perfect example of inactivity hurting you, this is too easy please respond so I can own both of you some more.

[tennis-legend]

pac needs to copy castillo

floyd needs to copy JMM

work for them both really

why do i give pacman the edge? the fight rests on him tbh

[MindBat]

Anxiously awaiting any credible and logical counter arguments from Floyd defenders.

Any counter arguments have been discussed before. Not that you would be satisfied anyway. No matter what anybody says.

HAHAHA

there is no counter argument

what can floyd do

shoulder roll- that doesn't work against south paws

pull counter- only works against shit jabs and 1 shot punchers (like shane). pac's combos will destroy the pull counter

elbow block- high elbow block- is actually illegal and the ref should stop it- pac doesn't fight inside anyway- so floyd wont get a chance to use it

forearm hold- HAHAHA, please- floyd wont see the punches coming

floyd doesn't have KO power

so how the fuck could he win if he doesn't have legs to run- and land enough counters to outpoint manny?

Only way to truly know is if the Pacman steps inside that ring against Floyd, right?

The 3 year delay of the fight by Team Pacquiao says it all doesn't it?

[tatangb45]

Here are some additional thoughts to consider:

1) Floyd has not really proven himself at WW. His six fights fights were against three B and C fighters, two smaller fighters from 1 and 2 divisions lower, and one 38 year old past prime fighter. Since he has avoided facing the bests in the WW division, how he performs against an elite fighter remains a big question mark.

And 2) Floyd has been hit before and, in a few occasions, wobbled by boxers with less power and less accomplished than Pac. Once he starts getting hit by Pac's bombs, and there's no doubt he is going to get hit by this relentless boxer, how will he react? Will he keep his ground and trade like he did with Shane and risk a KO, or will he start running, be mainly on the defensive, and lose his composure like what happened to most of Pac's opponents?
It is doubtful if can do to Pac what he did to Marquez for the obvious reason that a WW Pac is a lot different from a WW Marquez.
Floyd has also shown that he could not totally keep away from fighters like Castillo and ODLH, both of whom were a lot slower than Pac, and this was when Floyd was younger and more agile.
Even Hatton had his moments against Floyd and we've all seen the huge gap between Hatton and Pac.

If anyone would still insist that Floyd will simply school Pac, they better have their heads examined.