Interesting read. I don't agree with the whole inactivity thing. He was off almost 2 years before Marquez and looked great. There is zero proof of inactivity being an issue, especially since he'll be coming off a win against Ortiz.
At least the writer admitted at the end that there are 5 reasons why he will win. That would be a more interesting read to me.
Where is the "5 reasons why Pacquiao will lose to Mayweather" ?
I never bought the whole Mayweather struggles with southpaws theory. Every southpaw he's fought, he's beat and dominated. did he get hit a couple times? sure, but its boxing, its going to happen at the world championship level.
I also dont agree with his legs being gone. He was just more aggressive and stayed his ground against Marquez and Mosley, because he didn't need to be on his backfoot. He's a very diverse fighter, and his ability to "fight" with his opponents is underrated, much like Pacquaio's boxing ability is underrated.
""If you have been following Mayweather throughout his career you can easily see that he no longer has the great movements he once did. Floyd's defense and counter punching abilities are still great, but his legs are no longer there.
He is now forced to stand and trade punches more than he would like to. He is also cornered and reached easier with punches""
Comment