Explain to me how this isnt a knockdown

[johnm is...]

No, no,..this is as clear cut a knockdown as you can get...

Get punched, fall down.

Knockdown.

Some more brutal than others. All are knockdowns.

[fitefanSHO]

Would Pascal have gone down if you take the slippery surface out of the equation?

Logic does not apply here, but no, of course he would not have gone down.

[Ring Leader]

cuz ***** larry knows if the advertisment is slippery or not? you can see the punch wasnt hard and was a result of throwing and missing with the canvas slippering

[-Johannes-]

Get punched, fall down.

Knockdown.

Some more brutal than others. All are knockdowns.

johnm is awesome...

[fitefanSHO]

Get punched, fall down.

Knockdown.

Some more brutal than others. All are knockdowns.

Get punched, slip on infamous/notorious/problematic ring ad, fall down.

Not a knockdown.

Some refs better at making this call than others. All are NOT knockdowns.

[johnm is...]

Logic does not apply here, but no, of course he would not have gone down.

You talk about logic, but you're arguing that a guy getting hit with a perfectly timed shot, has nothing to do with him falling down.

You talk about logic, and then give an OPINION, and say "of course he wouldn't have", when you don't have any idea what would have happened.

The FACT is that he got punched, and went down. The FACT is that, that is a knockdown. Anything else is purely speculative.

[Ring Leader]

if ***** boy wants to talk about knockdowns not being scored, how about this one *****?

[johnm is...]

cuz ***** larry knows if the advertisment is slippery or not? you can see the punch wasnt hard and was a result of throwing and missing with the canvas slippering

You're arguing against yourself. You're saying that Larry doesn't know if it was slippery or not. And you do?

What we DO know, is that he went down directly after being punched. That, my friend, is a knockdown.

[johnm is...]

LOL @ turning this thread into a Floyd thread. No wonder you're ignorant ass is red.

[fitefanSHO]

You talk about logic, but you're arguing that a guy getting hit with a perfectly timed shot, has nothing to do with him falling down.

You talk about logic, and then give an OPINION, and say "of course he wouldn't have", when you don't have any idea what would have happened.

The FACT is that he got punched, and went down. The FACT is that, that is a knockdown. Anything else is purely speculative.

And the FACT is that the ref made the call in the ring (that it was a slip) and your OPINION is more than just a little meaningless at this point. That's a FACT!