-
-
how's that, bro...
not aware of it...
thanksComment
-
GET ***ED YOU DISHONEST WHINEY LITTLE **** !!
ANSWER MY QUESTIONS ***GO7, OR GO DROWN YOURSELF !!
What sort of arse-wipe would duck me like a b1tch, and then insinuate that he is "honest" ?
Answer my questions, or go somewhere and die quietly
You are just a dishonest ***wit, so the world has no further use for you
Capice' ?
1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?
2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?
4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?
5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?
6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?
7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?
8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?
[/QUOTE]
Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.Comment
-
It would not surprise me at all if that dishonest ****head tangalog2200 used an alt to support himself like that.
The clown will not answer my questions, and yet he insists that he is "honest" ?
Get this.....
What sort of a clown would attempt to tell me that he is " honest ", and then waste my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"
LMFAO
Comment
-
Whinealog2200, have you actually realised that I have about as much respect for you as I would for something that I peel off the bottom of my shoe?
Will not answer a couple of simple questions, but still want to reserve the right to call yourself honest
dishonest, whiney, fanboy, clown
Comment
-
respect is not a word you understand, son...Whinealog2200, have you actually realised that I have about as much respect for you as I would for something that I peel off the bottom of my shoe?
Will not answer a couple of simple questions, but still want to reserve the right to call yourself honest dishonest, whiney, fanboy, clown
like you do not understand what the words civil, friendly, honest and relevant mean..
as i have stated before, i can not help you..
bcoz you do not want to be helped....
bcoz you do not want to accept the fact that you need help..
just compile all your posts, son...
see how many times you resorted to irrelevant rehash; name-calling and the like..
do it not for me but for yourself...Comment
-
Correct, not in this conversation kid. For respect to occur within a conversation involving me, all parties would need to be honest and reasonable.
You are neither, so you can forget about getting any " respect " clownboy.
Smarten up kid, I understand EXACTLY what those words mean.
They are simply not required when it comes to you, thats all.
" civil " and " friendly ", go hand-in-hand with " respect ", and unfortunately for you, you would need to be both honest and reasonable in order to qualify for all-of-the-above..... but you are not.
Want proof ?
Then, whats with this dribble you clown ?
What sort of a clown would attempt to tell me that he is " honest ", and then waste my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"Comment
-
Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.[/QUOTE]GET ***ED YOU DISHONEST WHINEY LITTLE **** !!
ANSWER MY QUESTIONS ***GO7, OR GO DROWN YOURSELF !!
What sort of arse-wipe would duck me like a b1tch, and then insinuate that he is "honest" ?
Answer my questions, or go somewhere and die quietly
You are just a dishonest ***wit, so the world has no further use for you
Capice' ?
1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?
2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?
4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?
5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?
6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?
7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?
8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?
Here's hoping that this will somehow get through to you.
YOU NEED HELP BADLY!
People in your condition can become a danger to society, even to your own family, if not to yourself.
See a doctor, a priest or a pastor.
Better yet, take a break from this forum.
Seriously, it could do you some good.Comment
-
Wow, your heartfelt concern is deeply warming
Go *** yourself clown.
I just put that tangalog clown on ignore for repeated offenses of the dishonest whiney b1tch variety, so you can answer these questions now.
Here kid, knock yourself out.....
1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?
2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?
3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?
4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?
5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?
6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?
7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?
8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?[/QUOTE]
Comment
Tweet
Comment