Comments Thread For: Arum on Pacquiao-Marquez Tour Change, Floyd Jr, More

[tangalog2200]

" some people still do not understand " that dishonest people are truly the lowest form of scum on the planet.

How you clowns can sit there and happily lie to yourselves, just baffles me.

Like you did, when you wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

You have already been exposed, you had your dishonest whiney arse kicked on the other thread, so it funny to see you lurking around here whining about other posters.

Harden up man, you are a bigger crybaby than Pacquiao.

Crying about a couple of swear words, when I have to continually ready your polite but dishonest rubbish

wow, marvelous, lead!!!!

the thread about the law suit is still open...

jumping board?

still, just go back to post # 119 of that thread if you still has not learned anything..

and if i may add..use a dictionary, son...

look up the word relevance......

before posting on any other thread...

PLEASE!!!

[tangalog2200]

" some people still do not understand " that dishonest people are truly the lowest form of scum on the planet.

How you clowns can sit there and happily lie to yourselves, just baffles me.

Like you did, when you wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

You have already been exposed, you had your dishonest whiney arse kicked on the other thread, so it funny to see you lurking around here whining about other posters.

Harden up man, you are a bigger crybaby than Pacquiao.

Crying about a couple of swear words, when I have to continually ready your polite but dishonest rubbish

" some people still do not understand " that dishonest people are truly the lowest form of scum on the planet.

i take it you are looking yourself in a mirror when you typed the above...

[LeadUppercut]

" some people still do not understand " that dishonest people are truly the lowest form of scum on the planet.

i take it you are looking yourself in a mirror when you typed the above...

I did not perform the following dishonest action, you did

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

How dishonest can you get ?

Also, you have consistently ducked my questions, and yet insinuated that I was "avoiding" the issues.

I tell you what genius, seeing that you would not answer my questions on the other thread because they were "off the topic subject", how about answering them now?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

You, the excuse-master, are a fkn joke for insinuating that I am dishonest.

Why ?

Because, if you successfully refute any of those points, I will remove them.

And yet you will not even answer a simple question without talking utter ****.

[tangalog2200]

I did not perform the following dishonest action, you did

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

How dishonest can you get ?

Also, you have consistently ducked my questions, and yet insinuated that I was "avoiding" the issues.

I tell you what genius, seeing that you would not answer my questions on the other thread because they were "off the topic subject", how about answering them now?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

And by the way, it must really rile you now that the ENTIRE WORLD knows that Pac has been ducking Marquez since 2008.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

You, the excuse-master, are a fkn joke for insinuating that I am dishonest.

Why ?

Because, if you successfully refute any of those points, I will remove them.

And yet you will not even answer a simple question without talking utter ****.

lead, don't rehash already spent and irrelevant items...

and don't take things or my words out of context...

and son, don't use the word dishonest..specially on me.......

or any other negatives...

you can not prove it..to me or even to others you accused of dishonesty..and more

i have agreed or disagreed with other posters here on several occasions, on so many varied topics...

but we were able to enjoy the discussions as the topics were debated on its merits...

and the posts on its relevance....

at the expense of being too redundant and even being way off topic, let me ask you now; and hope you do not evade the questions and answer honestly;

a college professor asked a student about an algebraic expression; and the student in response began to sing a lady gaga song...

what's your take on the above?

was the singing the correct response to the professor's question?

was the singing even closely relevant to the question?

[AceBoeing]

lead, don't rehash already spent and irrelevant items...

and don't take things or my words out of context...

and son, don't use the word dishonest..specially on me.......

or any other negatives...

you can not prove it..to me or even to others you accused of dishonesty..and more

i have agreed or disagreed with other posters here on several occasions, on so many varied topics...

but we were able to enjoy the discussions as the topics were debated on its merits...

and the posts on its relevance....

at the expense of being too redundant and even being way off topic, let me ask you now; and hope you do not evade the questions and answer honestly;

a college professor asked a student about an algebraic expression; and the student in response began to sing a lady gaga song...

what's your take on the above?

was the singing the correct response to the professor's question?

was the singing even closely relevant to the question?

lol...hey LEAD go give yourself an UPPERCUT. I told you lay off Floyd's genitals

[LeadUppercut]

lead, don't rehash already spent and irrelevant items...

and don't take things or my words out of context...

and son, don't use the word dishonest..specially on me.......

or any other negatives...

you can not prove it..to me or even to others you accused of dishonesty..and more

i have agreed or disagreed with other posters here on several occasions, on so many varied topics...

but we were able to enjoy the discussions as the topics were debated on its merits...

and the posts on its relevance....

at the expense of being too redundant and even being way off topic, let me ask you now; and hope you do not evade the questions and answer honestly;

a college professor asked a student about an algebraic expression; and the student in response began to sing a lady gaga song...

what's your take on the above?

was the singing the correct response to the professor's question?

was the singing even closely relevant to the question?

You were a dishonest b1tch when you did the following, end of story.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Ridiculous whiney excuses that you dont even believe yourself

Grow up kid, you are done here.

[LeadUppercut]

lead, don't rehash already spent and irrelevant items...

and don't take things or my words out of context...

and son, don't use the word dishonest..specially on me.......

or any other negatives...

you can not prove it..to me or even to others you accused of dishonesty..and more

i have agreed or disagreed with other posters here on several occasions, on so many varied topics...

but we were able to enjoy the discussions as the topics were debated on its merits...

and the posts on its relevance....

at the expense of being too redundant and even being way off topic, let me ask you now; and hope you do not evade the questions and answer honestly;

a college professor asked a student about an algebraic expression; and the student in response began to sing a lady gaga song...

what's your take on the above?

was the singing the correct response to the professor's question?

was the singing even closely relevant to the question?

And what a jerk you are, you fkn clown

Go and re-read the post you replied to, you dishonest crybaby kid.

Still, ducked every single question, and still, replied with whiney dribble.

WHAT..... A..... CLOWN..... KID !!

[tangalog2200]

You were a dishonest b1tch when you did the following, end of story.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Ridiculous whiney excuses that you dont even believe yourself

Grow up kid, you are done here.

show me lead, show me where my dishonesty is/are...

but when you do...

please always copy paste my post # 119 and the complete copy of the post(s) where you say i am being dishonest...

why?

bcoz taking things and words out of context is your bread and butter..

and rehashing irrelevant posts...nothing more...

[tangalog2200]

And what a jerk you are, you fkn clown

Go and re-read the post you replied to, you dishonest crybaby kid.

Still, ducked every single question, and still, replied with whiney dribble.

WHAT..... A..... CLOWN..... KID !!

by the way, why did you not answer my questions regarding the student singing a lady gaga song?...etc...

[tatangb45]

And what a jerk you are, you fkn clown

Go and re-read the post you replied to, you dishonest crybaby kid.

Still, ducked every single question, and still, replied with whiney dribble.

WHAT..... A..... CLOWN..... KID !!

This is the prime example of how pathetic Floyd fanatics have become. Stuck with a coward and desperate for attention. They have been reduced to spewing garbage and unable to think straight.
Very sad... but they deserve it.