How did you score Calzaghe-Hopkins?

**Sadistic** · 08-02-2011, 11:53 PM

**JAB5239** · 08-03-2011, 12:22 AM

Originally posted by DOMINATION

I scored it 116-111 for Calzaghe.

Hopkins is Calzaghe's bitch.

[IMG]http://a669.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images01/90/l_a051cc4d7542d9162525125bc7041f4c.gif[/IMG]

**Left Hook Tua** · 08-03-2011, 12:25 AM

i scored it for the guy who actually threw punches.

you know the guy who didn't pretend low blows to get extra points and to get timeouts.

**Ringlife** · 08-03-2011, 01:30 AM

115 to 113 for Calzaghe.

**Sadistic** · 08-03-2011, 02:20 AM

Originally posted by JAB5239

I'm Ukrainian you idiot.

My grandfathers fought the ****s.

**Who are you?** · 08-03-2011, 02:32 AM

I scored it 116-111 Joe Calzaghe winning.

I thought it was the worst performance of Bernard's career, and the most decisively he has ever lost a fight.

Calzaghe was noticeably faster, more energetic.

CompuBox indicated for the fight that Calzaghe outlanded Bernard by a margin of 2-to-1. Thats quite significant and indicates an EASY WIN for Calzaghe.

Bernard was too slow, too inactive.

Calzaghe was just too fast and essentially swarmed Bernard with twice as many punches.

Calzaghe proved that night he is an alltime great.

Calzaghe always > Bernard

**uoykcuf** · 08-03-2011, 03:10 AM

It's damn near impossible to give a fight to someone who doesn't throw that much(probably because they fear of being hit so they just play counter-puncher the entire time). Clearly one fighter was making the fight more then the other. Hopkins said he had health issues for that fight whether that be true or not I don't know, I'm not a doctor.

**daggum** · 08-03-2011, 03:13 AM

Originally posted by Who are you?

I scored it 116-111 Joe Calzaghe winning.

I thought it was the worst performance of Bernard's career, and the most decisively he has ever lost a fight.

Calzaghe was noticeably faster, more energetic.

CompuBox indicated for the fight that Calzaghe outlanded Bernard by a margin of 2-to-1. Thats quite significant and indicates an EASY WIN for Calzaghe.

Bernard was too slow, too inactive.

Calzaghe was just too fast and essentially swarmed Bernard with twice as many punches.

Calzaghe proved that night he is an alltime great.

Calzaghe always > Bernard

yeah compubox must be right..............

**uoykcuf** · 08-03-2011, 03:15 AM

Originally posted by daggum

yeah compubox must be right..............

LOL, you must have been a Calzaghe opponent who got beat up by him. People have hinted you're jeff lacy but I would think jeff lacy would be mature then you are. Lacy seems nice in interviews, I hope you aren't him. But then again he/you might feel that Calzaghe costed him/your career with the beating you took.

I never seen anyone hate on a boxer as much as you do, something is wrong with you.

How did you score Calzaghe-Hopkins?