I thought Khan wanted to beat Peterson better then Bradley did??What happen??

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #41
    Originally posted by -Lowkey-
    This is hilarious and a new low for the OP who is quickly building up a reputation as one of the top nut huggers on this site. He talks about ‘Old man Morales’ not being a good fight and implies that Khan should be fighting the likes of Petterson.

    Lets see what he had to say when Bradley was rumoured to be fighting Morales (These are all quotes from older threads).



    Rome on the possibility of Morales Bradley being made.





    So in conclusion Rome finds a potential fight between Bradley and Morales as in his words ‘good for popularity’ ‘interesting’ and ‘exciting’. Yet hear he is making a thread criticizing Khan for potentially fighting Morales.

    Pot calling the Kettle Black much?
    If I'm not mistaken was those post in the thread stating that Morales was going to be made num 1 contender to Bradleys belt??If so you know ya fail right??

    Comment

    • vcvc
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2011
      • 3973
      • 237
      • 15
      • 4,542

      #42
      answer the question Rome, why do you think Morales is a legitimate opponent for Bradley but not for Khan???

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #43
        Originally posted by vcvc
        answer the question Rome, why do you think Morales is a legitimate opponent for Bradley but not for Khan???
        Bradley has 1.2 on the table and Morales was made the num 1 contender to Bradleys belt ..That fight made sense because of those facts,Khan Morales makes no sense bro for so many reasons...

        Comment

        • Money_May
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2011
          • 14683
          • 317
          • 264
          • 22,957

          #44
          Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
          Bradley has 1.2 on the table and Morales was made the num 1 contender to Bradleys belt ..That fight made sense because of those facts,Khan Morales makes no sense bro for so many reasons...
          Even if bradley is stripped and morales wins the title, so the khan v morales fight would be for the WBA, IBF AND WBC belts it still would not make sense?

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30186
            • 1,344
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #45
            Khan doesnt need to worry about outdoing Bradley against Peterson.

            He already took his Number 1 JWW Ranking.

            Comment

            • -Lowkey-
              Winter is coming
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 3161
              • 340
              • 506
              • 10,428

              #46
              Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
              If I'm not mistaken was those post in the thread stating that Morales was going to be made num 1 contender to Bradleys belt??If so you know ya fail right??
              Yes you are mistaken

              Those 3 quotes are all quotes from 3 separate threads.

              One entitled:

              Top five fights for Timothy Bradley!!!!!!!!.

              No I haven’t failed but you have been found out to be extremely bias.

              Comment

              • B.U.R.N.E.R
                ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 30186
                • 1,344
                • 400
                • 47,475

                #47
                Originally posted by -Lowkey-
                This is hilarious and a new low for the OP who is quickly building up a reputation as one of the top nut huggers on this site. He talks about ‘Old man Morales’ not being a good fight and implies that Khan should be fighting the likes of Petterson.

                Lets see what he had to say when Bradley was rumoured to be fighting Morales (These are all quotes from older threads).



                Rome on the possibility of Morales Bradley being made.





                So in conclusion Rome finds a potential fight between Bradley and Morales as in his words ‘good for popularity’ ‘interesting’ and ‘exciting’. Yet hear he is making a thread criticizing Khan for potentially fighting Morales.

                Pot calling the Kettle Black much?

                Comment

                • vcvc
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 3973
                  • 237
                  • 15
                  • 4,542

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                  Bradley has 1.2 on the table and Morales was made the num 1 contender to Bradleys belt ..That fight made sense because of those facts,Khan Morales makes no sense bro for so many reasons...
                  yeah but even then morales didnt deserve the number 1 spot just like he dont deserve the belt now, so plz try again......

                  Comment

                  • Rome-By-Ko
                    The winner Is
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 20157
                    • 323
                    • 332
                    • 29,833

                    #49
                    Originally posted by -Lowkey-
                    Yes you are mistaken

                    Those 3 quotes are all quotes from 3 separate threads.

                    One entitled:

                    Top five fights for Timothy Bradley!!!!!!!!.

                    No I haven’t failed but you have been found out to be extremely bias.
                    You said three differeent threads but only gave one thread name??Interesting once again Morales makes sense for Bradley being the fact he had 1.2 mill on the table and Morales was his mando..Khan has the top spot at Jr WW right??What does he gain from fighting Morales??Why not fight his Mando??

                    Comment

                    • Ray*
                      Be safe!!!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 44867
                      • 1,654
                      • 1,608
                      • 558,890

                      #50
                      Rome, you are seriously losing all the credibility that you have left, low-key just expose you now but instead of maning up you're still trying to reverse the card, Before it was Khan need to get 2 belts like Bradley, Now it's Khan need to fight Peterson to outdo Bradley, guess what Khan doesn't have to fight Peterson for *****, I would rather khan fight the Maidana-Guerrero winner or for the stripped WBC to make him undisputed at 140 before moving on to 147 instead of wasting his next fight on Peterson.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP