When B-hop beats Dawson he deserves to be P4P 1
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
What the **** does age have to do with a P4P list? If a 80 year old would beat some useless 40 year old journeyman would that make him the P4P #1?
Pascal was the #1 guy because the division is weak. Froch easily beat his ass. Cunningham wouldn't be the #1 P4P if he whooped Huck again and the second contender after him now would he?
Dawson is the #3 contender according to The Ring, and it's not like he has been climbing the list lately... He has looked like **** to be honest.
Putting Hopkins as the #1 P4P after a Dawson win is the most ****** thing I've heard since that ***** said a decade was 11 years.Comment
-
well wtf does beating a shane mosely (floyd left over) clottey (bum) and cheato (KO'd by shane) do for p4p 1?What the **** does age have to do with a P4P list? If a 80 year old would beat some useless 40 year old journeyman would that make him the P4P #1?
Pascal was the #1 guy because the division is weak. Froch easily beat his ass. Cunningham wouldn't be the #1 P4P if he whooped Huck again and the second contender after him now would he?
Dawson is the #3 contender according to The Ring, and it's not like he has been climbing the list lately... He has looked like **** to be honest.
Putting Hopkins as the #1 P4P after a Dawson win is the most ****** thing I've heard since that ***** said a decade was 11 years.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment