Just saw the replay this morning. Where Khan hit Judah, and where Judah was grabbing in pain was clearly 4" apart. Judah has been in 53 fights, I think he knows the difference between a standing 8 count vs five minutes to recover for a low blow. It just doesnt make sense, if youre not standing why would the ref stop at 8 and let you lay there in pain? I dont think Bradley is ever going to fight Khan, and it's sad bc thats probably the one fight that I think would really shut the haters up... who are pretty quiet right now tho...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Amir Khan Knocks Zab Judah Out in Five Rounds
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ElderlyBeater View PostYou are very bias against Amir and always have been. Bradley fan?
I have seen you try and find every single thing against him.
Bradley is good, no doubt but it is a fact he is the reason the fight did not go on.
Originally posted by BesWorldChamp View PostWhen someone makes about 6 different points, and all of them are downplaying someone's dominant performance, there is a strong possibility that the person is biased.
This is the case here.
Comment
-
For the millionth time: People keep saying it was on the belt line THE BELT LINE IS ****ING LOW.
Doesn't mean it hit him on the nuts, means that based on where the referee determined their belly buttons were, that the punch landed below the belly button, which is a low blow.
Bunch of morons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lorily View PostWhether or not I'm a Bradley fan is irrelevant. Just because I call Amir on the ridiculous things he says and does doesn't make me bias against Amir. The things AMIR says and does makes me bias against Amir. Just because so many of his fans don't call him on the foolish things he says doesn't mean I can't. If he says things that are dillusional, I'm gonna call him on it. Besides, don't act like you don't do that with fighters you don't like. I've seen you do that plenty of times yourself, say like against Floyd Mayweather. We are all entitled to our own opinion.
When someone makes 6 different points and the only thing being refuted is whether it was a "legal" blow (an area set by the ref himself) or not, how does that negate the other 5 points? Just because I have the gall to call Amir on some of the whack a$$ things he says and does, doesn't mean my opinion isn't valid. This is a site where you're supposed to put your opinion on things, no? Just because that opinion differs from yours doesn't make it bias - or wrong. I'm not a sheep, I don't have to follow what someone else thinks I should follow. I have my own opinion.
Go back to the kitchen and cook some food.
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Lorily View PostWhether or not I'm a Bradley fan is irrelevant. Just because I call Amir on the ridiculous things he says and does doesn't make me bias against Amir. The things AMIR says and does makes me bias against Amir. Just because so many of his fans don't call him on the foolish things he says doesn't mean I can't. If he says things that are dillusional, I'm gonna call him on it. Besides, don't act like you don't do that with fighters you don't like. I've seen you do that plenty of times yourself, say like against Floyd Mayweather. We are all entitled to our own opinion.
When someone makes 6 different points and the only thing being refuted is whether it was a "legal" blow (an area set by the ref himself) or not, how does that negate the other 5 points? Just because I have the gall to call Amir on some of the whack a$$ things he says and does, doesn't mean my opinion isn't valid. This is a site where you're supposed to put your opinion on things, no? Just because that opinion differs from yours doesn't make it bias - or wrong. I'm not a sheep, I don't have to follow what someone else thinks I should follow. I have my own opinion.
Comment
Comment