Boxing debate - Duran, Leonard, Pacquiao, Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #1

    Boxing debate - Duran, Leonard, Pacquiao, Mayweather

    Last edited by Vadrigar.; 07-22-2011, 02:02 PM.
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #2

    Comment

    • Everywhere
      Banned
      • Jul 2011
      • 1191
      • 124
      • 65
      • 1,507

      #3
      I love how they start with "Manny Pacquiao is great, but knowing what I know and my involvement in the sport he is clearly on something"

      And thats the guy defending Pacquiao being better than Duran

      Comment

      • Vadrigar.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8134
        • 517
        • 415
        • 20,350

        #4
        Originally posted by RachelB
        I love how they start with "Manny Pacquiao is great, but knowing what I know and my involvement in the sport he is clearly on something"

        And thats the guy defending Pacquiao being better than Duran
        He did say after "if the x-factor wasn't there".

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 49486
          • 5,032
          • 270
          • 104,043

          #5


          Who are these people? I don't know who are they, are they considered credible?

          Crazy statments in these videos.

          My favourite is 'Leonard was at the tail end of his career with Duran beat him'

          'Jack Johnson over Sugar Ray Robinson' hahahaha.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49486
            • 5,032
            • 270
            • 104,043

            #6
            People shouldn't talk about history until they actually know about history. I strongly believe this.

            The guy is saying Duran's legacy should be questioned becasue he quit but at the same time says Robinson is in the Top 5 of all time who as we know retired on his stool against Joey Maxim.

            Different circumstances of course but still, an obvious double standard there.

            The guy is comparing Robinson's competition to Tyson's and Klitschko's

            Comment

            • Vadrigar.
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 8134
              • 517
              • 415
              • 20,350

              #7
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza


              Who are these people? I don't know who are they, are they considered credible?

              Crazy statments in these videos.

              My favourite is 'Leonard was at the tail end of his career with Duran beat him'

              'Jack Johnson over Sugar Ray Robinson' hahahaha.
              I host is pretty knowledgeable and credible, check out his own videos. The guy who called in is defending the "new generation" so to speak and gets broken down quickly. Continue listening.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49486
                • 5,032
                • 270
                • 104,043

                #8
                I'm on 'Part 3' now.

                My word, Hopkins a Top 3 Middleweight 'unquestionably'? Man.

                'Calzaghe should be above Hopkins at MW'

                The guy calling in is ridiculously ****** and the other 2 are clearly more knowledgeable than him but the other 2 say some pretty absurd things also.

                Comment

                • Vadrigar.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 8134
                  • 517
                  • 415
                  • 20,350

                  #9
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  I'm on 'Part 3' now.

                  My word, Hopkins a Top 3 Middleweight 'unquestionably'? Man.

                  'Calzaghe should be above Hopkins at MW'

                  The guy calling in is ridiculously ****** and the other 2 are clearly more knowledgeable than him but the other 2 say some pretty absurd things also.
                  What absurd things have they said? He has offered anyone who disagrees to call into the show.

                  Comment

                  • IronDanHamza
                    BoxingScene Icon
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 49486
                    • 5,032
                    • 270
                    • 104,043

                    #10
                    Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                    What absurd things have they said? He has offered anyone who disagrees to call into the show.
                    Things like Hopkins is unquestionably a Top 3 MW. Which, is false, on any level.

                    I think I watched a video by that Bruce guy before I believe, a Video on Joe Louis. Which was pretty good.

                    Like I said the two guys are much more knowledgeable than the other guy, though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP