Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

[D4thincarnation]

Pacquiao

Bradley 39%
Marquez 43%
Molsey 50%
Margarito 58%
Clottey 34%

44.8% Average



Mayweather

Cotto 34%
Ortiz 49%
Mosley 46%
Marquez 59%
Hatton 39%

45.4% Average


Mayweather just edges in front only by 0.6%.

It seems when it comes o accuracy there is not much between Pacquiao an Mayweather.


For me though, Pacquiao is the more accurate all things being equal.

[The Big Dunn]

Pacquiao

Bradley 39%
Marquez 43%
Molsey 50%
Margarito 58%
Clottey 34%

44.8% Average



Mayweather

Cotto 34%
Ortiz 49%
Mosley 46%
Marquez 59%
Hatton 39%

45.4% Average


Mayweather just edges in front only by 0.6%.

It seems when it comes o accuracy there is not much between Pacquiao an Mayweather.


For me though, Pacquiao is the more accurate all things being equal.

I wonder how many times you changed the fights you selected for each guy to get it as close as you could? Its ok, manny is taking the loss like a man, why can't you?

[D4thincarnation]

I wonder how many times you changed the fights you selected for each guy to get it as close as you could? Its ok, manny is taking the loss like a man, why can't you?

If I took 2 fight average it is Pacquiao, 3 fight average it is Pacquiao 4 fight average it is Pacquiao.

It is clear Pacquiao is increasing that edge.

[The Big Dunn]

If I took 2 fight average it is Pacquiao, 3 fight average it is Pacquiao 4 fight average it is Pacquiao.

It is clear Pacquiao is increasing that edge.

Right dude. sure.

[Rolaz]

Let the two settle the issue INSIDE THE RING.

[D4thincarnation]

Right dude. sure.

You don't have to believe me if you can do simple maths

Pacquiao's opponents have also been more defensive, which should make it harder for him to land his shots.

[The Big Dunn]

You don't have to believe me if you can do simple maths

Pacquiao's opponents have also been more defensive, which should make it harder for him to land his shots.

Yup sure. Its ok dude. Make manny as great as you need to.

[p4p-champ]

Mayweather out does Manny on the accuracy, that shouldn't even be questionable. Why don't you put up a more vital stat, like PLUS/MINUS ratings? This is the art of boxing...

Mayweather (9 fights @ 147-+)
Overall Conn. %: 42%
Opp. Conn. %: 17%
+/- Rating: +25

Ward (7 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 39%
Opp. Conn. %: 24%
+/- Rating: +15

Gamboa (6 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 32%
Opp. Conn. %: 20%
+/- Rating: +12

Pacquiao (7 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 38%
Opp. Conn. %: 27%
+/- Rating: +11

Klitschko, V. (9 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 35%
Opp. Conn. %: 25%
+/- Rating: +10

[IMG]http://i1071.***********.com/albums/u519/mognoose27/cashcow.jpg[/IMG]

[D4thincarnation]

Mayweather out does Manny on the accuracy, that shouldn't even be questionable. Why don't you put up a more vital stat, like PLUS/MINUS ratings? This is the art of boxing...

Mayweather (9 fights @ 147-+)
Overall Conn. %: 42%
Opp. Conn. %: 17%
+/- Rating: +25

Ward (7 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 39%
Opp. Conn. %: 24%
+/- Rating: +15

Gamboa (6 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 32%
Opp. Conn. %: 20%
+/- Rating: +12

Pacquiao (7 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 38%
Opp. Conn. %: 27%
+/- Rating: +11

Klitschko, V. (9 fights)
Overall Conn. %: 35%
Opp. Conn. %: 25%
+/- Rating: +10

[IMG]http://i1071.***********.com/albums/u519/mognoose27/cashcow.jpg[/IMG]

Because this is about accuracy. And Pacquiao has shown what an accurate puncher he is, even when his opponents are on the defensive for 12 rounds.


Mayweather had a 5% +/- edge over Cotto while Pacquiao had a 15% edge over Bradley.

[intoccabile]

it was actually disapointing to see Bradley pull a Juanma, and walk toward his opponent with his chin up when hurt, looking to ****, and pac missing overhands that weren't even slipped. He'd just....miss.