Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #441
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation
    No, because I have pointed out Pacquiao throws the jab a lot more not to land according to compubox, so the figures for the jabs don't mean much.

    Because the jab is going where Pacquiao wants it to go but according to compubox it is not landing.
    So Pacquaio has a poor jab. Good.

    Still no counter facts provided.

    Fact: Floyd has a higher total connect percentage and is therefore more accurate than Pacquiao (see Boxing Tiger's posts in this thread)

    Read this fact nice and slowly. I'm sure you'll get it soon.

    Comment

    • Carpe Diem
      Seize the day
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 16006
      • 1,226
      • 988
      • 44,413

      #442
      Great thread.

      Comment

      • D4thincarnation
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 16198
        • 533
        • 260
        • 133,240

        #443
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        So Pacquaio has a poor jab. Good.

        Still no counter facts provided.

        Fact: Floyd has a higher total connect percentage and is therefore more accurate than Pacquiao (see Boxing Tiger's posts in this thread)

        Read this fact nice and slowly. I'm sure you'll get it soon.
        When a battleship has fired 5 warning shot just above another ships bow and the shots go just above the other ships bow. Is there something wrong with the battleship's accuracy. Because according to compubox it accuracy is 0%

        Sorry for the analogy but you seem to have difficultly understanding.

        Comment

        • Carpe Diem
          Seize the day
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 16006
          • 1,226
          • 988
          • 44,413

          #444
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation
          When a battleship has fired 5 warning shot just above another ships bow and the shots go just above the other ships bow. Is there something wrong with the battleship's accuracy. Because according to compubox it accuracy is 0%

          Sorry for the analogy but you seem to have difficultly understanding.
          Yawn. Get over it, man. Manny isn't more accurate than Floyd, just accept it and move on.

          Comment

          • skillswin
            Undisputed Champion
            • May 2011
            • 1968
            • 63
            • 6
            • 8,120

            #445
            Originally posted by D4thincarnation
            When a battleship has fired 5 warning shot just above another ships bow and the shots go just above the other ships bow. Is there something wrong with the battleship's accuracy. Because according to compubox it accuracy is 0%

            Sorry for the analogy but you seem to have difficultly understanding.
            [IMG]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WXbJfJ-veLI/TT06929xKrI/AAAAAAAAEWc/QSaAAj-ymCE/s1600/Age-of-******3.png[/IMG]

            Comment

            • skillswin
              Undisputed Champion
              • May 2011
              • 1968
              • 63
              • 6
              • 8,120

              #446

              Comment

              • Vadrigar.
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 8134
                • 517
                • 415
                • 20,350

                #447
                Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                When a battleship has fired 5 warning shot just above another ships bow and the shots go just above the other ships bow. Is there something wrong with the battleship's accuracy. Because according to compubox it accuracy is 0%

                Sorry for the analogy but you seem to have difficultly understanding.
                No need to apologize for your ignorance. Lets go back to what's relevant.

                So far you've established Pacquiao has a poor jab, so does this increase or decrease his accuracy?

                Still no counter facts provided.

                Fact: Floyd has a higher total connect percentage and is therefore more accurate than Pacquiao (see Boxing Tiger's posts in this thread)

                Read this fact nice and slowly. I'm sure you'll get it soon.
                Last edited by Vadrigar.; 08-04-2011, 05:44 PM.

                Comment

                • D4thincarnation
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 16198
                  • 533
                  • 260
                  • 133,240

                  #448
                  Originally posted by Boxing Tiger
                  Yawn. Get over it, man. Manny isn't more accurate than Floyd, just accept it and move on.
                  He is the numbers prove it.

                  I've explain why have taken the jab out, and not one of you can counter my arguments on why.

                  And when I asked simple questions they are ducked because you know it will lead you to the truth, that is Pacquiao is more accurate.

                  Comment

                  • Vadrigar.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 8134
                    • 517
                    • 415
                    • 20,350

                    #449
                    Originally posted by Boxing Tiger
                    Great thread.
                    I'm just clowning around now.

                    Comment

                    • D4thincarnation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16198
                      • 533
                      • 260
                      • 133,240

                      #450
                      Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                      No need to apologize for your ignorance. Lets go back to what's relevant.

                      So far you've established Pacquiao has a poor jab, so does this increase or decrease his accuracy?
                      I see you still don't understand.

                      And you choose to ignore simple questions.

                      As they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't teach it what accuracy means and why compubox jab figures can mislead.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP