I'm not a Pac nuthugger, nor am I a hater - I'm trying to present a balanced argument here.
While I was thinking about boxing the other day, I thought - "Marquez gave Pacquiao a hell of a fight on two occasions, and nobody has matched that since. If Pac completely destroys Marquez this time around, doesn't that prove there's something fishy e.g. PEDs??"
Then I realised - not necessarily. The fight (correct me if I'm wrong) is happening at 145, and perhaps if Pac beats JMM decisively then that is just because he has adjusted much better to moving up in weight, and has gained far more power by doing so.
This may seem like a ****** point to bring up, but I'd be interested to know what you think in terms of Pacquiao going from someone who struggled against him to a complete monster in 3 years.
While I was thinking about boxing the other day, I thought - "Marquez gave Pacquiao a hell of a fight on two occasions, and nobody has matched that since. If Pac completely destroys Marquez this time around, doesn't that prove there's something fishy e.g. PEDs??"
Then I realised - not necessarily. The fight (correct me if I'm wrong) is happening at 145, and perhaps if Pac beats JMM decisively then that is just because he has adjusted much better to moving up in weight, and has gained far more power by doing so.
This may seem like a ****** point to bring up, but I'd be interested to know what you think in terms of Pacquiao going from someone who struggled against him to a complete monster in 3 years.
Comment