For Pac: I would disagree with omitting Marquez II and putting Cotto in the "shot" category. He didn't look great against Clottey (nobody does, besides Pac) but he didn't look terrible either. I think the first half of the Pac fight showed he was very game, it's just his chin couldn't hold up yet again. Almost everyone picked him to be stopped? What? Odds favored Pacquiao, but if anything many boxing experts figured it would be very competitive.
I would categorize him closer "neutral win" rather than a good or bad one, along with something like Mayweather/Mosley. Mosley was inactive, overtrained, and somewhat close to the version that fought Pac IMO. People bought into the hype too much of a great win that was already 1.5 years old by the time he fought Mayweather in his next fight. Not a bad win, but not a great one either.
I would categorize him closer "neutral win" rather than a good or bad one, along with something like Mayweather/Mosley. Mosley was inactive, overtrained, and somewhat close to the version that fought Pac IMO. People bought into the hype too much of a great win that was already 1.5 years old by the time he fought Mayweather in his next fight. Not a bad win, but not a great one either.
Good times.

Comment