Based purely on skill, your top 5 fighters of the decade?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Except, speed and power are skills. Skill wins fights. Manny wins fights. Manny has skills. Are we really going to create a slope so slippery as to say, for instance, that Pernell Whitaker wasn't a good fighter? A slope so slippery that we're going to penalize a fighter for daring to have too much talent? Good god.
What exactly is the formula for skill prorating? ******ed.
Nope. speed and power are attributes in my book. It's all subjective anyways, there is no definite way to place these in any category. It's just the way I see it and alot of other people see it. So, I find it absurd to have a guy who couldn't think to uppercut a person, who not only wouldn't throw a punch but had a basic high guard to be on a pure skill list.
Never said he wasn't a good fighter either. Your mistaking this thread for a p4p list or best fighter list. Which it isn't.Comment
-
I'm gonna go by decade as in 2000-2009.
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr
2. Bernard Hopkins
3. Wladimir Klitschko
4. Juan Manuel Marquez or Erik Morales
5. Joel Casamayor[obviously not in the later part of the 00's]
I almost wanted to put Joan Guzman and Chris John, but they just never fought/don't fight top guys consistently and Guzman has no discipline with his weight. I think at 122-126, Guzman is a really good fighter and his good skills were showcased best in the lower weights. Now he's just a waste of talent sadly, I think his career is over but I hope i'm wrong.Comment
-
Comment
-
most skilled?
1.mayweather
2.b hop
3.donaire
4.marqez
5.chad dawson
all of these fighters are very skilled and would probably rank among the mosts skilled of all time, imo.Comment
-
I felt the same. I wanted to put Casamayor too but I felt that the margin between the guys I thought for 4 or 5 was too razor thin to put them up.I'm gonna go by decade as in 2000-2009.
1. Floyd Mayweather Jr
2. Bernard Hopkins
3. Wladimir Klitschko
4. Juan Manuel Marquez or Erik Morales
5. Joel Casamayor[obviously not in the later part of the 00's]
I almost wanted to put Joan Guzman and Chris John, but they just never fought/don't fight top guys consistently and Guzman has no discipline with his weight. I think at 122-126, Guzman is a really good fighter and his good skills were showcased best in the lower weights. Now he's just a waste of talent sadly, I think his career is over but I hope i'm wrong.Comment
-
I think Humberto Soto is a very skilled fighter, and Guzman basically outboxed him easily. Wasn't even close. Sadly, that's the only real good win that stands out. He has a couple of more good wins. But Soto is his signature win. I would have liked him to have more signature wins, like a win over Cambell when the fight was canceled because Guzman didn't make weight. I just shake my head at Guzman in disappointment, what a shame.Comment
-
Comment
Comment